Name one long term consequence of the railroad.

1 answer:

6 0

One of the primary consequences of the railroad in the United States was the creation of a system by which goods could easily be moved east to west, opening new sections up that were previously only accessible by horse or on foot.

You might be interested in

Competition occurs when two or more people or groups work together to achieve a goal that will benefit more than one person. Tru

Feliz [49]

Answer:

I think true

Explanation:

this is a tough question because composition can occur and only benefit one person. competition can also just occur between two people.

7 0

3 years ago

Can someone help me on 3 & 4?

EleoNora [17]

3 is they had wanted to have a system that would not end up in coasos

3 0

3 years ago

What was the major impact on the indian removal act

boyakko [2]

Answer: The Indians were lied to and they had to give up their land and move out west.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is true of Brown v. Board of Education (1954)? Select one: a. The Court outlawed de facto segregation. b.

lozanna [386]

The correct answer is B. The Court outlawed de jure segregation.

Explanation:

Brown v. Board of Education was a legal case in 1954, in this, Oliver Brown and other African American parents sued the Board of Education for the segregation in schools as African-American children had to attend school at a different building than other children. This situation was common by then and it was part of the de jure segregation or the segregation supported by law as before the Brown v. Board of Education case segregation was allow if the services provided were equal. However, with the Brwon v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court established this segregation was unconstitutional and therefore it outlawed de jure segregation.

6 0

3 years ago

Compare and contrast a court “precedent” and a president “precedent”

GenaCL600 [577]

Court precedents are used in case of having no clear interpretation of the law for a particular case. President's precedents are simply acts performed by a President in a similar situation.

Explanation:

Court precedents serve as an alternate to written laws when the existing guided laws are not suitable or simply not enough for a particular situation that arises.

For this, the court can refer to a previous judgement as basis for their own judgement. Thus, court precedents are enforceable by law.

Precedents set by a President serve at best, as guidelines.

They are simply acts performed by a previous President when met with a similar situation.

3 0

3 years ago