Answer:
The carbon from CO2.
Explanation:
DON'T make the mistake of saying "from the nutrients in the ground" or "the dirt".
The equation of photosynthesis is
6CO2+6H2O -> C6H12O6+O2
That's all I will give you - you can write the claim evidence reasoning based on that. If you need more help comment! Good luck!
Answer:
1. What is the relationship between body shape and the habitat where they are most commonly found?
2. What is the difference between toads having a thicker skin than frogs?
Explanation:
<u>Toads and frogs are amphibians that belong to the same family, live in lakes, rivers and wetlands and have some similar characteristics</u>. Among their main differences are:
- The skin of toads is rougher, drier and rougher. While frog skin is moist and smooth.
- Frogs live in humid areas, although they can go out to dry land for food. Whereas toads can survive longer on the ground away from moisture, as they have greater water control in the body.
- Frogs are characterized by long limbs that favor long hopping and swimming. On the other hand, toads have shorter legs.
- Toads tend to be more rounded, muscular and stocky. Frogs tend to be more slender.
- Most toads are poisonous. In contrast in frogs, not all species are poisonous.
Given these observations, two questions that may arise could be:
1. What is the relationship between body shape and the habitat where they are most commonly found? This is that frogs have longer legs which helps them to swim and that is why they are more commonly found in water. While toads have shorter legs that even allow them to burrow into the ground, they can survive longer on land.
2. What is the difference between toads having a thicker skin than frogs? Toads have thicker and more impermeable skin than frogs, which allows them to live in drier places. Also, the blood of the toad is of higher osmotic concentration than water.
Explanation:
Option first is the correct one
Answer: When she finished adding in everyone's ideas, Sofia stepped back and realized that she would need to make a new banner.
Explanation:
anwser on quiziz
Answer:
Charles Ehler: incorrect.
Wendell Mullison: correct.
Robert Rodriguez: correct.
Judy Johnson:correct.
Explanation:
-Charles Ehler´s statement is incorrect because in order for a chemical company launch a new product it must pass several tests, that´s why products lasts years in proves, there are several tests such as the environment test that proves that the product doesn´t affect other species, or the human safety that makes sure the product doesn´t affect human health.Wendell Mulison´s statement proves to be correct with this as well.
-Robert Rodriguez´s statement is correct because even though there are several tests that take care human healt there are just a few based on the damage pesticides produce to the land where are used.
-Judy Johnson´s statement is correct because science has proved that the resistant of parasites as being increasing with the products tat are used to combat them. Bacterias are an example of it, many drugs used against bacterias are now useless for some people because of the resistantthey have developed.
-One specie that can be taken as a pesticide can be the ground snail, that affects some plants and also may contain a parasite aclled "Hepatic fasciola" that affects sheeps and goats of farmers.
-One viable method to control pesticides is the sue of other species to control them, this specie has to be adequate to the land, for example, if a farmer wants to get rid of the ground snails because of the parasite and the damage they do to their platings, they can introduce ducks to the farm that eat them without damaging the land with any kind of chemical product.
