It is <span>To perpetuate their existence by changing their goal or reason for existence,
</span>
The question is incomplete, so the complete question is as follows:
What is an example of a reason why historical interpretations may change over time?
A. Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
B. Political scientists discover a new method of scientific research.
C. Economists may learn more about how ancient governments operated.
D. New X-ray technology proves that previous medical conclusions were incorrect.
Answer:
A). Archeologists may uncover new climate evidence.
Explanation:
The Archeologists works to reveal several historical interpretations on thebasis of facts gathered from primary sources of evidence.
The example that [roves chnaging interpretation over time by archeologists is that they may uncover new climate evidence which can change the earlier facts and can reveal several new things. Archeologists can change tehir views whenever they will find some new and more strong evidences.
Hence, the correct option is "A".
Answer:
B. A cold front pushes warm air upward, and the cold front collides with a cold front,
Explanation:
An occluded front is a form of a weather front that is formed in a situation or condition that involves a cold front surpassing a warm front. Here, the cold air mass from the cold front moves faster to collides with the cool air that is in front of the warm front. This will then lead to warm air rising when the air masses joined concurrently.
Hence, the best evidence to support that an occluded front is occurring is option B A cold front pushes warm air upward, and the cold front collides with a cold front,
