1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
TiliK225 [7]
3 years ago
7

Write your counterargument and rebuttal here: While some may argue that …. I disagree because …

History
2 answers:
zhannawk [14.2K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

We need more explanation! If there is a passage please provide us with a screenshot, and a rebuttal is saying that you disagree if that helps!

Explanation:

Mekhanik [1.2K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

i disagree

Explanation:

You might be interested in
1. When Frederick Douglass stated,
Alik [6]

Answer:

He meant that the act was made to increase the power of slave states.

Explanation:

He made that statement when he's commenting about the Fugitive slave act of 1850. This act was made to made sure slaves that escaped  the free states to be returned to the owners.

Douglass believed that this act was a conspiracy that made by legislators from Sothern states to expand the power of the slave states.

Mason & Dixon lines were the lines that separated the slaves states and free states region. Douglass believed that the fugitive slave act of 1850 made this line basically obsolete. The free states wouldn't be able to provide protection to African American like they intended to.

6 0
3 years ago
From its earliest days who was invited to join the Church?
Vera_Pavlovna [14]
People from the east and west were invited to the church when it first started.
8 0
3 years ago
Why was joining the WTO such a major step for China?
denis23 [38]

Answer:answer B

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What do the governments of Mexico and Denmark have in common?
Afina-wow [57]

Answer:

The United States of Mexico is a federal presidential republic. The Constitution of 1917 is in force with numerous amendments. Executive power belongs to the president, who is the head of state and government. The President forms the cabinet, appoints and removes ministers, the Attorney General (with the approval of the Senate), members of the Supreme Court (with the approval of the Senate) and other senior public servants. The President determines domestic and foreign policy, has legislative initiative and veto power, establishes diplomatic relations and concludes international treaties. The president is elected by the people on the basis of universal, direct, secret ballot, without the right to re-election. Legislative power belongs to the bicameral National Congress. The principles of public administration in accordance with the 1917 Constitution meet the criteria for representative liberal democracy.

Denmark is a constitutional monarchy. The constitution was adopted in 1849; amendments were made in 1915 and 1953, when a unicameral parliament was created and women were allowed to become head of state. The head of state is the king, who exercises legislative power together with a unicameral parliament. The highest legislative body is Folketing. Executive power belongs to the monarch and is carried out on his behalf by the government. The government is appointed by the Prime Minister, approved by Folketing and is accountable to him.

Thus, the similarity is the fact that in Mexico the president and in Denmark the king determine domestic and foreign policy. However, the difference is obvious, primarily consisting in the very form of government - the republic and the monarchy, respectively, with all the further differences that follow from this.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Refer to the two passages.
Art [367]

Answer:

World powers contributed more troops to United Nations peacekeeping forces

Explanation:

According to both Source 1 and Source 2, it is described that the UN peacekeeping has come under increased scrutiny based on how they acted or failed to act in peacekeeping missions.

In Source 2, Rwandan professor Joseph Nsengimana spoke on how the UN soldiers allowed the local militia to maim and murder over 3 million people in the Rwandan genocide and how they let the Rwandan people down.

The events described in Source 2 influenced world powers’ stance on foreign intervention in the late 1990s and early 2000s by making them contribute more troops to United Nations peacekeeping forces.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How might the Reconquista have affected Spain's economic and cultural life?
    15·2 answers
  • What was the earliest system of laws ever recorded
    9·1 answer
  • Why did it seem likely that the allies would lose in early 1942
    14·1 answer
  • Can you help me with this?
    8·1 answer
  • Examine how British policies toward the colonies changed in the wake of the French and Indian War. How did these policies lead t
    7·1 answer
  • On what point did Plato and aristotle agree
    11·1 answer
  • In what ways did Louis XIV support the arts
    10·1 answer
  • What 3 ideas were taught by Martin Luther king
    13·1 answer
  • Compare theater and film makeup. How are they similar and how are they different? Why do you think that is? Research and write y
    12·1 answer
  • GIVING ALOT OF POINTS incorrect answers will be reported
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!