The North continued to grow, but so did the tensions between Northern abolitionists and Southern slaveholders
Answer: They are both democratic.
Explanation:
The political organization of plains tribes was rather loose and in general quite democratic. Each band, gens, or clan informally recognized an indefinite number of men as head men, one or more of whom were formally vested with representative powers in the tribal council.
It's definitely not in a theocracy: those usually favour the majorities.
Also migrant labors don't specifically favour minorities.
Now, between democracies and command economies the choice is very hard, as it depends more on the specific country. So for example in many places the role of the minorities rose in command economies, since they went against the patriarchy (in China this was the case for example, the role of women in China improved drastically, while women and minorities are still struggling in Japan, which is a democracy). On the other hand, Nazi Germany was also a command economy, and yet it was very bad for minorities
I would say that the question is too complex to give just one answer, but I would also argue for option d)
Answer:
His opinion on the purpose of government. His ability to bring people together. His views on the trade of enslaved people.
Explanation:
