1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tigry1 [53]
3 years ago
7

in the Plessy vs Ferquson decision, Supreme Court justices claimed that the Fourteenth Amendment did not protect

History
1 answer:
Bond [772]3 years ago
6 0

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court issued in 1896. It upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality – a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".

or

Plessy v. Ferguson, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court, on May 18, 1896, by a seven-to-one majority (one justice did not participate), advanced the controversial “separate but equal” doctrine for assessing the constitutionality of racial segregation laws.

You might be interested in
What is Capitalism in South Africa<br>​
Oksanka [162]

Answer:

South Africa is a capitalist country but very few people really understand in detail what this means. The country's capitalist economy thrived under colonialism and apartheid, and some say it is doing even much better under democracy.

Explanation:

please mark me brainliest please

4 0
3 years ago
Select the causes of the Civil War *
Sliva [168]

Answer:

Abraham Lincoln's election

Slavery

State's Rights

4 0
3 years ago
The Founders of the United States gave much consideration to the division of
nikklg [1K]

When the framers designed the US Constitution they did not give the Federal government much power so power was balanced between States and Central Government. But the Federal government has gained more and more power over time. At the same time, the States were restricted over the years, when the Framers did not imagine doing so.

Both of these situations can be good or bad. For example, making the States respect the Bill of Rights was a good thing when individuals had their basic rights stripped on a State level. So making only the Federal government respect the Bill of Rights did not make much sense.

At the same time, the Federal Government has shown much power that was not designed and showed a few issues over the years, especially with the Executive Branch that had in a few opportunities overstepped its powers.

6 0
3 years ago
What is considered the opposite of Democracy?
joja [24]

Answer:

TRYANNY!

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Is the Pohoantas movie related to the real life events
mr_godi [17]
Kind of...I guess it's related to how the Spanish went to the America's to colonize them.

Hope this helps!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Under Chief Justice Earl Warren, the Supreme Court addressed all of the following issues EXCEPT
    14·1 answer
  • Who would have supported malcolm x booker t washington vs marcus garvey?
    6·1 answer
  • President _____ marks the beginning of the fourth party system in the united states.
    5·1 answer
  • Voting rights have been extended constitutionally to various groups throughout the history of our country. what was the most rec
    7·1 answer
  • Compare the responses of China and Japan to imperialism. How did each country respond to intervention by foreign nations and how
    14·1 answer
  • Golden age of indians gupta empire was known for
    14·1 answer
  • Why was Russia interested in fighting the<br> Ottoman Empire for control of the Balkans?
    10·1 answer
  • Faktor hari sukan diadakan
    7·1 answer
  • What belief did the two men share about American
    15·1 answer
  • Most Egyptians did not believe in an afterlife and focused only on life here and now.
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!