1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lakkis [162]
3 years ago
6

7. Horses were already in the Americas by the time explorers got there. True or false?

History
1 answer:
Natasha_Volkova [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The answer is false

Explanation: North America was the cradle of the horse's evolution, and horses existed here up until 8,000 to 12,000 years ago, when climate change and/or the arrival of humans and hunting caused the extinction of horses on the continent.

So in summary they had to bring horses back to the Americas because they were previously hunted to extinction.

You might be interested in
What two lands were captured by egypt during the middle kingdom?
Elanso [62]
<span>During the middle kingdom, Egyptians captured the lands "Nubia" -a region along the Nile rivers and the "Syria"-a country in Western Asia, bordering Lebanon and the Mediterranean Sea to the west, Turkey to the north, Iraq to the east, Jordan to the south, and Israel to the southwest.in Palestine</span>
5 0
4 years ago
Did Andrew Jackson's response to the nullification crisis promote democracy
Vadim26 [7]
No, didn't really fit the issue. Congress were the ones who lowered the taxes.
5 0
3 years ago
Punishing someone for an action that did not used to be a crime is an example of
Naddik [55]

The correct option is "an ex-post facto law."

The ex post facto means after the fact or incident. The law punishes someone for an action that does not used to be a crime when the action was performed. For example, you play in front of Congress and next day legislators make a law which criminalizes the same. So next day you will be arrested under the ex post facto law. Under the US constitution this law has been declared unconstitutional as fairness has been the fundamental principal of US constitution and democracy.


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was Daniel Carroll view on slavery
oksano4ka [1.4K]
Carroll was a wealthy planter, slave owner, and large land owner who risked his socials and economic position by supporting the Patriot cause of American independence. He was concerned that the Revolution might fail and bring economic ruin to his family as well as mob rule. He was a friend and strong ally of George Washington; he believed in and "worked for a strong central government that could secure the achievements and fulfill the hopes of the Revolution." In the Convention, Carroll fought for a government that would be responsible to the people directly.
7 0
4 years ago
ANSWER IS BELOW:
irakobra [83]
Um the correct answer is D \
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Given what you know about the mongols way of life how did the existence of the steppe impact their extremely rapid and vast expa
    9·1 answer
  • According to the Declaration of Independence what is the purpose of government
    5·1 answer
  • Land-use management is an especially pressing problem in most
    15·1 answer
  • A writer should revise an argumentative essay for ideas and
    7·2 answers
  • Who were the winners and losers from the exploits of companies like the VOC?
    5·1 answer
  • Select all the correct answers.
    14·2 answers
  • How is the effect of the French Revolution still evident in 21st-century culture?
    5·1 answer
  • Which statements accurately describe arguments made against President Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003?
    9·2 answers
  • Germany was divided after World War II because:
    12·1 answer
  • The Columbian Exchange is the name given to the widespread exchange of plants, animals, and communicable diseases between the Ea
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!