Answer:
Yes, in many ways, they were immoral when it came to taking actions towards Native Americans.
Explanation:
After the discovery of the New World, many European countries tried their hands in establishing colonies in unknown lands. Clashing differences between the Natives and Americans led the U.S. government to approve over 1,500 wars, raids, and attacks on Indians. Native Indians ordered to leave their homeland and forced to walks for miles towards that led to known as the trail of tears.
Spain reaches America with conquistador and soldiers in search of gold and riches. Spanish establish colonies and converted many of the Native Indians into Christianity. Catholic Missionaries showed no tolerant attitude toward traditional religious practices. Spanish colonizer killed and conquered old civilizations like Inca, Maya, and Aztec. They introduced the encomienda system.
The answer is A. The Soviet system of government did not allow its people to choose their own leaders, which the United States thought was wrong.
Explanation:
After the Second World War differences between the United States and the Soviet Union increased which led to the Cold War from 1947 to 1991, besides a competence for showing which country that was superior in terms of military force, science and spatial capability, this conflict emerged due to the difference in terms of government. Indeed, in the Soviet Union, the government was based on socialism and totalitarianism, which meant citizens did not participate in a political decision or chose their leaders.
On the opposite, the U.S. had a democratic system and due to this, promoted the idea of democracy in all countries and believed the system of the Soviet Union was wrong or morally incorrect. Thus, the government in the Soviet Union supported this conflict because "The Soviet system of government did not allow its people to choose their own leaders, which the United States thought was wrong".
Answer:
European colonialism in Asia and Africa.
Explanation:
European colonialism in Asia and Africa altered the patterns of global economic interactions in the 19th and 20th Century.
In a nutshell, the protective tariffs were responsible for the development of the economy in the north but had the opposite impact in the south where they had the opposite effect.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What action was an economic cause of increased tension between the north and south?</h3>
Generally, One of the economic factors that contributed to the escalating tensions between the North and the South was the protective tariff. In terms of its economy, the North had developed into an industrialized region and had a large number of enterprises. On the other hand, the South maintained a significant reliance on agricultural production.
To assist the Northern Industries, high protective tariffs were imposed on commodities imported from other countries. Because of this, additional goods had to be purchased from northern vendors.
The South was forced to pay a higher price for the items that they imported from Europe as a result of this tariff, which benefited the North but put a bigger burden on the South.
To summarize, the protective tariffs contributed to the expansion of the economy in the north while having the opposite effect in the south.
Read more about the economy
brainly.com/question/2421251
#SPJ1
CQ
Which of these measures contributed to an increase in the economic tensions that existed between the North and the South?
Dred Scott decision
Protective levies on imports
Bleeding Kansas
The election of Lincoln
Answer:
Britain also needed money to pay for its war debts. The King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the colonies. They decided to require several kinds of taxes from the colonists to help pay for the French and Indian War. ... They protested, saying that these taxes violated their rights as British citizens.
Explanation:
here you go
