1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Phantasy [73]
2 years ago
8

In 200 words describe whether or not you think it is ever okay to kill others for a greater good.

History
2 answers:
Shtirlitz [24]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

This is a sketchy subject, but to kill is an abomination. One the the ten commandments is to not murder, but,

lets say that you spotted a terrorist, and you have a gun. This man is about to kill thousands of people. Would you shoot? Most people would say yes. How is this any different from a single murder done by a man?

It is actually simple. Defense, you are defending yourself or others, and saving many more souls by killing one. Now, if there is another way to disarm the threat, by all means do so. but if your only option was to kill or let others be killed. The acceptable thing to do, would be, to shoot.

(Warning: This is only 119 words, you may add to it to bump it up to 200)

Archy [21]2 years ago
5 0
It’s not good sorryryryry
You might be interested in
What is put to shame
nikitadnepr [17]
So hurt someone feeling not being happy or them self anymore because someone said something that wasn't nice
5 0
3 years ago
What was Commodore Perry’s significant contribution to the beginning of Japan’s transformation?
mixer [17]
Your answer is he opened Japan to the west.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
German Nazi leader Adolf Hitler began a military pursuit to conquer the Rhineland, Sudetenland, and Austria in the years leading
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]
The correct answer is the last one. France and England followed a policy of appeasement z
6 0
2 years ago
Why did anti-federalists criticized the constitution?
Elenna [48]
The anti-federalist felt that the constitution would give too much power to the federal government. They basically were opposed because of what was in it or what wasn't in it because of fear that their civil liberties would be stripped off due to everyone functioning off of the constitution. They more so wanted a bill of rights to proclaim all the liberties a citizen is granted to avoid this.   
4 0
3 years ago
What are the factors of production in business?
faltersainse [42]

Answer:

Economists divide the factors of production into four categories: land, labor, capital, and entrepreneurship. I know entreprenuership isn't on there, but i think you'll get the answer from the first three.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was the primary negotiator of the Compromise of 1850?
    5·2 answers
  • What did the samurai call their form of religion souicide​
    14·1 answer
  • IDENIFYING POINTS OF VIEW List two ressons that the british soldliers mighhi have believed they were justified when they fired o
    15·1 answer
  • Consider the following sentences: John gives Samual his hockey stick. In this sentence, Samual is the
    10·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE I NEED IN 10 MINUTES!! :(((((((
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the state of the war Europe in 1943?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did President Lincoln reject the Wade-Davis bill?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the Mexican government pass colonization laws for Texas?
    8·1 answer
  • Why do you think the us invaded iraq<br>​
    13·1 answer
  • As a citizen, it is important that one’s opinions are _________.
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!