Answer:
On August 23, 1939, the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany concluded a non-aggression pact - the famous Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, signed in Moscow by the main diplomats of both countries. The parties pledged to refrain from attacking each other and not to support third countries in the war against Germany or the USSR. However, this agreement, although it came as a surprise to the Western powers and the allied Nazis of Japan, was only part of the pact.
With the filing of Joseph Stalin and with the consent of Adolf Hitler, the heads of two foreign affairs agencies - Vyacheslav Molotov and Joachim von Ribbentrop - also signed a secret protocol to the document. It provided for the separation of spheres of influence of the USSR and Nazi Germany in Eastern Europe in the event of a "territorial and political reorganization." One of the German representatives explained that the earlier hostility to Soviet Bolshevism ceased after the changes in the Comintern and the Soviet Union abandoned the world revolution.
Explanation:
Both political parties and interest groups are formally organized.
interest groups are an organization of people who share a common interest and work together to protect/ promote that interest by influencing the government.
Interest groups very greatly in size, aims, and tactics. And as far as political parties use campaign finance committees to raise funds for election purposes.
Show his support for the movement. If I remember correctly he wanted everyone to be equal
The difference is the reason they went on the march D king did it because they wanted civil rights AIM march did it because they wanted to help rebuild there economy with housing land and also to stop drug abuse and starving
Yes.
Even though democracy in theory must be something almost completely free of influence, all the influence of the people who have more power in society is still great, and it increases as social inequality grows
In situations where the population is in favor of deconcentrating income and wealth, this will has not found support in the political arena. On the one hand, there are those who insist on denying the problem, stating that the growth of social inequality does not produce adverse effects for society; on the other, there are those who declare that nothing can be done about the matter, since the culprits would be the <u>“market forces”</u>, neutral and impersonal economic mechanisms.
