One of the common arguments why the process of transplanting non-human organs which came from animals may be considered as an ethical act is that antigens on the surface of the non-human organs are not significantly rejected in the process. Although its research is still substantial, it is still considered as a matter of ethical issue.
True because since there are not many ways for them to erode they can thrive
I think false because no one knows what will happen in the future and anything is possible, although the population does increase it can still decrease by high amounts aswell, anything bad could happen any time. People may not even have money to survive but it really depends on what happens and what could happen in the future, no one really knows what will happen so this statement would be false.
Anyway have a nice day :)
Small bone fractures that develop in response to repetitive, cumulative trauma are known as stress fractures. These are fractures where bones are injured by overuse, they are commonly found in the spine, vertebrae, leg bones, feet, and the pelvis. They result from the accumulated trauma from repeated submaximal loading, such as running or jumping
