Officially, Alex is not in the labor force.
Given that he is not actually employed (doesn't have an actual job), he cannot be considered part of the labor force. If he had some kind of job other than taking care of his children (even if it's a freelance job he can do from his home), then he would be in the labor force. However, this way, he is not and fall into the same category as unemployed students, for example.
Answer:
the state’s interest in regulating the matter.
Explanation:
The law in the state of Arizona affects the interstate commercial activities around trucking and the court would seek avenues to make sure that the unfavorable impacts of the law on interstate commerce gets balanced off with the interest of the state in regulating the matter. The court will not try to balance off that burden on interstate against non-commercial activities in the area or the authority of the courts to ascertain if a law is constitutional or not.
All other options stated above are incorrect except option C
It’s obviously traditional so your answer is C
They allow archaeologist to picture what life could of been like
In the gospel of John. In the Bible.
