Answer:
The project to accept is:
e. E
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Cost of capital = 10%
Mutually Exclusive Projects:
A B C E
Payback (years) 1 5 2 5
IRR 18% 20% 20% 12%
NPV (Millions) $40 $75 $35 $100
b) Project E should be preferred over all the other projects. It has the highest net present value (NPV) and its internal rate of return (IRR) is above the company's cost of capital. It surpasses projects A, B, and C in financial performance terms using time-value of money analysis.
Answer:
$10,000
Explanation:
Based on the information given we were told that the government contribution to the pension plan was the amount of $10,000 for year 1 which simply means the amount of $10,000 will be the pension expenditure for the general fund for year 1.
Therefore the pension expenditure for the general fund for year 1 will be $10,000.
Answer:
The entry is not required because the outcome is reasonably possible, not certain or probable. So IAS 37 says that the liability must not be recognized as the outcome is not reasonably certain or probable.
Explanation:
The liability must be included in the financial statement only if the outcome is certain or probable. In this scenario, the outcome is reasonably possible but neither certain nor probable in this situation. So the entry in the financial statement is not required. If the liability is of a huge amount then IAS 37 says that their must be a disclosure in the financial statement notes about the lawsuit.
Answer:
the value of the MktRS (market rate of substitution) is 0
Explanation:
The computation of the market rate of substitution is shown below:
Since it is mentioned that
You like apples half as pears
So the equation would be
X = 1 ÷ 2 Y
X ÷ Y = 1 ÷ 2
Now the market rate of substitution of the price is
= $2 ÷ $4
= 1 ÷ 2
So,
= 1 ÷ 2 - 1 ÷ 2
= 0
Hence, the value of the MktRS (market rate of substitution) is 0
The same is to be considered
