Answer:
C. Primary or Secondary sources related to the event.
Explanation:
A historian using primary or secondary resources related to the events is the most reliable.
In 1948,the United Nations divided the land Palestine between an Arab and Jews.United Nations made Palestine and Israel,two independent nations,side by side,in 1948.So we can say that Israel was created by this action of land in 1948.
The modern conflict between Jews and Arabs dates back to the 1910s,when both groups laid claim to the British controlled territory.
The Jews were Zionists,recent emigrants from Europe and Russia who came to the ancient homeland of the Jews to establish a Jewish national state.
The native Palestinian Arabs sought to stem Jewish immigration and set up an Islamic Muslim Palestinian non secular state.
In 1929,Arabs and Jews openly fought in Palestine,and Britain attempted to limit Jewish immigration as a means of appeasing the Arabs.As a result of the Holocaust in Europe,many Jews illegally entered Palestine during World War 2.
Answer:
- They thought it escalated a war that the United States was supposedly withdrawing from.
Explanation:
At that time, President Richard Nixon was discussing a de-escalating inclusion of the American troops in the Vietnam War, yet the troops were besieging Cambodia in the meantime. This aggravated the American individuals that were restricting war. On May 4, 1970, understudies of Kent State University went up against the Ohio National Guardsmen on grounds. Four understudies were murdered amid the encounter.
Answer:
Explanation:
If you just talk about the 1960s there really was only one effective way and that was non violent civil disobedience. And the most effective gender were women. Rosa Parks became a leader because "the time was right." By that time, many of the colored "were part of the family." The most effective blows were cast against the middle class and the lower middle class who needed or wanted the colored as servants, as paid companions, as laborers such as gardeners. So when the "uprising" came, the whites were not threatened; they were inconvenienced more than anything. Rosa Parks didn't really disobey her orders nor her place in life. She just bent the rules a bit. She walked to work for one thing. Many of the colored choose that way. Just boycott the buses. It meant that the city of Birmingham, for example, lost a lot of money because they had to run empty buses.
Voting didn't show itself to be as effective as civil disobedience. Yes the colored had the vote. They even had guarantees that came with the vote. In 100 years the vote had really done them no good. There were laws that were created that got them nothing with the vote.
Violence was met with violence. Violence was there for people that had no patience. See anything to do with the Klan. The KKK was not easily intimidated.
So if non violence was so effective, why was it not tried before? I don't know about you, but I can just imagine what would have happened had the slaves tried it before the civil war. They would have had the skin whipped off their backs. After the civil war was no better -- in fact a lot worse. There were many ex-slaves and too few jobs. The "gentry" could pay what they liked for the jobs they needed doing by untrained uneducated labor.
-Invasion por recursos naturales
-como amenaza por el pago de una deuda.
-para generar desequilibrios sociales y economico.
