1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tigry1 [53]
3 years ago
14

In your opinion, what is the most effective method for changing society—voting, challenges in the courts, nonviolent civil disob

edience, or violence? What evidence can you provide from actual events in the 1960s to support your argument?
History
1 answer:
goldenfox [79]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

If you just talk about the 1960s there really was only one effective way and that was non violent civil disobedience. And the most effective gender were women. Rosa Parks became a leader because "the time was right." By that time, many of the colored "were part of the family." The most effective blows were cast against the middle class and the lower middle class who needed or wanted the colored as servants, as paid companions, as laborers such as gardeners. So when the "uprising" came, the whites were not threatened; they were inconvenienced more than anything. Rosa Parks didn't really disobey her orders nor her place in life. She just bent the rules a bit. She walked to work for one thing. Many of the colored choose that way. Just boycott the buses. It meant that the city of Birmingham, for example, lost a lot of money because they had to run empty buses.

Voting didn't show itself to be as effective as civil disobedience. Yes the colored had the vote. They even had guarantees that came with the vote. In 100 years the vote had really done them no good. There were laws that were created that got them nothing with the vote.

Violence was met with violence. Violence was there for people that had no patience. See anything to do with the Klan. The KKK was not easily intimidated.

So if non violence was so effective, why was it not tried before? I don't know about you, but I can just imagine what would have happened had the slaves tried it before the civil war. They would have had the skin whipped off their backs. After the civil war was no better -- in fact a lot worse. There were many ex-slaves and too few jobs. The "gentry" could pay what they liked for the jobs they needed doing by untrained uneducated labor.

You might be interested in
The southern economy expanded during the Civil War. Unlike the northern states, the southern states were completely self suffici
dybincka [34]

As regards the claim that the Southern Economy expanded during the Civil War, this is False.

<h3>What happened to the Southern economy in the Civil War?</h3>

When war broke out, the North acted to deny the South its means of trading with other parts of the world.

This, coupled with the destruction the war brought, damaged the Southern economy and forced it to shrink instead of expand.

Find out more on the effects of the Civil War on the South at brainly.com/question/15784261.

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Anthony is a 30-year-old man who has resided in Georgia for 10 months. Why is he not eligible to run for the Georgia House of Re
suter [353]

35 is the age minimum to run for office

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the impact of the United States decision to purchase Alaska?
Svetlanka [38]

 A major motivation behind the United States’ decision to purchase Alaska was the established seal fishery industry in the territory promised economic benefits.

HOPE THIS HELPS          

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What came after the Roman Empire?
Deffense [45]

Answer:

Byzantine Empire.

It would last for 1000 years after Rome

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Can propose __________ (changes) to the constitution.
galben [10]

Answer:

Under Article V of the Constitution, there are two ways to propose and ratify amendments to the Constitution. To propose amendments, two-thirds of both houses of Congress can vote to propose an amendment, or two-thirds of the state legislatures can ask Congress to call a national convention to propose amendments. To ratify amendments, three-fourths of the state legislatures must approve them, or ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states must approve them.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Peter and Catherine The Great both instituted a lot of changes into Russian society. What is one that they both failed to accomp
    13·1 answer
  • Drag each description to the Supreme Court case it matches.
    8·1 answer
  • By Virginia law, what was the child of a slave woman and a free man
    15·1 answer
  • Describe the form of government in ancient Egypt
    11·1 answer
  • Which career in the correctional system primarily deals with counseling inmates?
    10·2 answers
  • How did the state governments develop after the colonies gained independence?
    8·2 answers
  • What led to a serious dispute between the large and small states under the Articles of Confederation?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following battles was the first Civil War engagement in Indian Territory? A. Battle of Pea Ridge B. Battle of Locus
    6·1 answer
  • SUPER FUN EASY POINTS TO GET!
    6·2 answers
  • So i need help with this question if ur good at history
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!