1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tigry1 [53]
2 years ago
14

In your opinion, what is the most effective method for changing society—voting, challenges in the courts, nonviolent civil disob

edience, or violence? What evidence can you provide from actual events in the 1960s to support your argument?
History
1 answer:
goldenfox [79]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

If you just talk about the 1960s there really was only one effective way and that was non violent civil disobedience. And the most effective gender were women. Rosa Parks became a leader because "the time was right." By that time, many of the colored "were part of the family." The most effective blows were cast against the middle class and the lower middle class who needed or wanted the colored as servants, as paid companions, as laborers such as gardeners. So when the "uprising" came, the whites were not threatened; they were inconvenienced more than anything. Rosa Parks didn't really disobey her orders nor her place in life. She just bent the rules a bit. She walked to work for one thing. Many of the colored choose that way. Just boycott the buses. It meant that the city of Birmingham, for example, lost a lot of money because they had to run empty buses.

Voting didn't show itself to be as effective as civil disobedience. Yes the colored had the vote. They even had guarantees that came with the vote. In 100 years the vote had really done them no good. There were laws that were created that got them nothing with the vote.

Violence was met with violence. Violence was there for people that had no patience. See anything to do with the Klan. The KKK was not easily intimidated.

So if non violence was so effective, why was it not tried before? I don't know about you, but I can just imagine what would have happened had the slaves tried it before the civil war. They would have had the skin whipped off their backs. After the civil war was no better -- in fact a lot worse. There were many ex-slaves and too few jobs. The "gentry" could pay what they liked for the jobs they needed doing by untrained uneducated labor.

You might be interested in
“How were the state constitutions and the colonial charters different”
12345 [234]

Answer:

Each had an executive; most had a two-house legislature. They were different because they were new states were self-governing, had constitutions/bills of rights, and allowed more people to vote.

6 0
2 years ago
Why did Spain come to the New World
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

The motives for Spanish exploration was to find Northwest Passage

Explanation:

The motives for Spanish exploration was to find Northwest Passage, which they believed was a direct and best route to the Orient home of spices, silks and wealth.

6 0
3 years ago
What was the overall importance of mcculloch v. maryland (1819)? a. the justices announced that dual federalism did not conform
Law Incorporation [45]
<span>What was the overall importance of mcculloch v. maryland (1819)? 

a. the justices announced that dual federalism did not conform to the framers' design. 

b. the justices declared that all national banks were unconstitutional.

 c. the justices forced all states to open at least one branch of the national bank. 

d. the justices interpreted the delegated powers of congress broadly, creating the potential for increased national powers. 

e. the justices gave a very restricted definition of congress's delegated powers, in keeping with the era of dual federalism? 




Your Answer will be: (D)

<span>d. the justices interpreted the delegated powers of congress broadly, creating the potential for increased national powers. </span>

</span>
3 0
3 years ago
What areas were affected by the spread of buddhism
jek_recluse [69]
Buddhism today has had a global impact with followers living and traveling around the world from the United States to Europe and Africa. However, Buddhism began and is most strongly rooted in Asia. Buddhism has had an enormous impact religiously and politically on South Asia and South East Asia in places such as India, Nepal, Vietnam, Cambodia, and China. 
8 0
2 years ago
What invention allowed the greatest personal freedom of travel?
ehidna [41]

Definately <em><u>B. The Automobile</u></em>

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What's the term for someone who supported Great Britain in the war?
    7·1 answer
  • What is a democratic party
    6·1 answer
  • What were some of the major points of disagreement during ratification of the constitution?
    12·1 answer
  • In what way did the leadership of George Washington of the new republic era impact the nation?
    5·1 answer
  • At the 2016 Democratic National Convention, ________ emerged as a powerful and heavily criticized force in the nominating proces
    15·1 answer
  • A play showing how Benjamin Franklin flew a kite during a lightning storm.
    7·1 answer
  • Why would someone moving to Texas need a letter of recommendation?
    14·1 answer
  • Briefly explain the people's crusade
    14·1 answer
  • How did the south react to the 13th amendment
    9·2 answers
  • Question 1 of 10
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!