1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mashcka [7]
3 years ago
5

What two nations after WWII were the biggest capitalistic and communist nations?

History
1 answer:
balandron [24]3 years ago
8 0
The United States for capitalistic and the USSR for communist
You might be interested in
What is not a reason given in the article as to why the Soviet Union continuing to gain power was a problem for the United State
fenix001 [56]

Answer:

<em>Hello There Again. the correct Answer B. </em><u><em>Soviet Union seeks to spread a "fanatic" belief in communism, which is opposite the beliefs of the United States.</em></u>

Explanation:

Because The concept of "socialism in one country" was conceived by Stalin in his struggle against Leon Trotsky and his concept of permanent revolution. In 1924, Trotsky published his pamphlet Lessons of October in which he stated that socialism in the Soviet Union would fail because of the backward state of economic development unless a world revolution began. Stalin responded to Trotsky's pamphlet with his article, "October and Comrade Trotsky's Theory of Permanent Revolution". In it, Stalin stated, that he did not believe an inevitable conflict between the working class and the peasants would take place, further adding that "socialism in one country is completely possible and probable". Stalin held the view common amongst most Bolsheviks at the time; there was possibility of real success for socialism in the Soviet Union despite the country's backwardness and international isolation. While Grigoriy Zinoviev, Lev Kamenev and Nikolai Bukharin, together with Stalin, opposed Trotsky's theory of permanent revolution, they diverged on how socialism could be built. According to Bukharin, Zinoviev and Kamenev supported the resolution of the 14th Conference (held in 1925) which stated that "we cannot complete the building of socialism due to our technological backwardness." Despite the rather cynical attitude, Zinoviev and Kamenev did believe that a defective form of socialism could be constructed. At the 14th Conference, Stalin reiterated his position, claiming that socialism in one country was feasible despite the capitalist blockade of the country. After the conference, Stalin wrote "Concerning the Results of the XIV Conference of the RCP(b)", in which he stated that the peasantry would not turn against the socialist system because he believed they had a self-interest in preserving.[43] The contradictions which would arise with the peasantry during the socialist transition, Stalin surmised, could "be overcome by our own efforts". He concluded that the only viable threat to socialism in the Soviet Union was a military intervention.

In late 1925, Stalin received a letter from a party official which stated that his position of "Socialism in One Country" was in contradiction with Friedrich Engels own writings on the subject. Stalin countered, stating that Engels' writings 'reflected' "the era of pre-monopoly capitalism, the pre-imperialist era when there were not yet the conditions of an uneven, abrupt development of the capitalist countries." From 1925 onwards, Bukharin began writing extensively on the subject, and in 1926, Stalin wrote On Questions of Leninism, which contained his best-known writings on the subject. Trotsky, with the publishing of Leninism, began countering Bukharin's and Stalin's arguments, claiming that socialism in one country was possible, but only in the short-run, and claimed that without a world revolution it would be impossible to safeguard the Soviet Union from the "restoration of bourgeoisie relations". Zinoviev on the other hand, disagreed with both Trotsky and Bukharin and Stalin, holding instead steadfast to Lenin's own position from 1917 to 1922, and continued to claim that only a defecting form of socialism could be constructed in the Soviet Union without a world revolution. Bukharin, by now, began arguing for the creation of an autarkic economic model, while Trotsky, in contrast, claimed that the Soviet Union had to participate in the international division of labour to develop. In contrast to Trotsky and Bukharin, Stalin did not believe a world revolution was possible, claiming in 1938 that a world revolution was in fact impossible, and claiming that Engels was wrong on the matter. At the 18th Congress, Stalin took the theory to its inevitable conclusion, claiming that the communist mode of production could be conceived in one country. He rationalised this by claiming that the state could exist in a communist society, as long as the Soviet Union was encircled by capitalism. However, surprisingly, with the establishment of socialist regimes in Eastern Europe, Stalin claimed that socialism in one country was only possible in a large country like the Soviet Union, and that the other states, in order to survive, had to follow the Soviet line.

6 0
3 years ago
Briefly explain one major difference between leuchtenburg's and interrante's interpretations of cities and rural areas during th
mafiozo [28]
The major difference between Leutchtenburg's and Interrante's interpretations of cities and rural areas during the 1920s was the geographical reorganization of rural and urban areas. The regions were drawn together and a more independent relationship between them. The relationship was evident in towns and cities which outlined difference around urban centres.
The towns attracted people from the surrounding countryside and central cities. Farm families which were converted to surrounding countryside were tied to urban culture and urban market. People habits of consumption were charged by shifting from direct production of goods to be purchasing them markets of metropolitan and this made women go to the marketplace and come out of the household.
4 0
3 years ago
Why we should have bombed Auschwitz and why not?
Karolina [17]
Well bombing Auschwitz would be good because we would kill a bunch of nazis 
but on the down side we would also kill the prisoners their. but also most the world outside of germany knew about the camps so even if we could bomb it we didnt even know about them
5 0
3 years ago
This is a photograph of a Roman<br><br> insula.<br> aqueduct.<br> bridge.<br> coliseum.
marin [14]

the answer is aqueduct

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A southern slave owner argues that slavery is too important to the South's
wlad13 [49]

Answer:

Think about slavery. The average African-American will have very low morale if he is forced to work. Low morale means their work ethic will slip, and sub-par work ethic leads to sub-par product. You'll actually be saving money if you free your slaves. Rather than paying tens of thousands of dollars to buy them and then paying for all of their expenses beyond that, you'll just have to pay them monthly or weekly wages. Abolition is both cost effective and stimulating to the economy.

Explanation:

Large concentrations of individuals were more expensive to care for, especially medically. Most slave owners were primarily concerned about the so-called "wage bubble" that would burst and leave all slave owners destitute, when in reality slave owners who freed their slaves and still had some working for them as freemen flourished.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What virus is believed to have caused the destruction of hundreds of thousands of honey bee colonies across North American and E
    9·2 answers
  • Which Prussian chancellor deliberately started a war with Austria and used his victory to unite German states under Prussian aut
    11·1 answer
  • What might be the best explanation for why the ancient Greeks were influenced by so many different cultures? Question 4 options:
    6·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt about a Viking invasion in England. As [the Vikings] were going to their ships, the English army should have c
    15·2 answers
  • According to article 1 of the constitution, what power does the legeslative branch have?
    14·1 answer
  • What were the Montgomery bus drivers responsible the bus rules ?
    9·1 answer
  • How do monopolies harm free enterprise
    5·1 answer
  • Why did Germany invade the Soviet Union during World War II
    8·1 answer
  • True or False?....The purchase of Louisiana was a tremendous deal as we acquired about 828,000 acres for $15 million, a price of
    8·2 answers
  • What were the reason of Alexander succuss in creating an Empire​
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!