Answer:
The Fed should decrease the real federal funds rate by 0.5%
Explanation:
The formula according to Taylor can be expressed as;
N=I+R+0.5(I-I*)+0.5(Y-Y*)
where;
N=nominal fed fund rate
I=inflation rate
R=real federal fund rate
I*=target inflation rate
Y-Y*=output gap
In our case;
N=4%=4/100=0.04
I=2%=2/100=0.02
R=unknown=R
I*=assume 2%=2/100=0.02
Y-Y*=-3%=-3/100=-0.03
replacing;
0.04=0.02+R+0.5(0.02-0.02)+0.5(-0.03)
0.04=0.02+R+0-0.015
0.04=R+0.005
R=0.04-0.005=0.035
Change=R-N
Change=0.04-0.035=0.005
The Fed should decrease the real federal funds rate by 0.5%
1.) student loans due to the fact that they are more secure than credit card debt and maybe have long periods before they have to be paid off.
2.) chad has a maximum amount of money he can use before it has to be paid back. Unfortunately chads maximum was so low he couldn’t even buy popcorn, or he already maxed out his card.
Answer:
Predictive models
Explanation:
Predictive modeling uses statistics to predict outcomes. It can be applied to any type of unknown event, regardless of when it occurred.
Answer:
$12.50
Explanation:
Variable costs are those costs which changes with the change in activity driving the cost (Sales. production etc.). It can be direct or indirect costs.
Whereas fixed costs are those costs which remains constant and do not change with the change in activity.
All the following costs are variable costs
Average Cost per Unit
Direct materials $6.45
Direct labor $3.30
Variable manufacturing overhead $1.25
Sales commissions $1.00
Variable administrative expense <u>$0.50</u>
Total variable cost per unit <u>$12.50</u>
All the following costs are fixed costs.
Fixed manufacturing overhead $3.00
Fixed selling expense $1.05
Fixed administrative expense $0.60
Answer: (C) Brian is liable because the court will pierce the corporate veil.
Explanation:
The phrase "PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL" is used to describe a situation where a Court decides to hold Corporate Shareholders and/or LLC Owners personally liable for the liabilities of a corporation.
When individuals act in a way that does not separate them from the company (dissolving this 'veil'), the Court looks upon this seriously and treats it in kind. Some instances of this happening are, failure to keep business and personal funds separate and diverting business assets for personal use without proper documentation as Brian seems to have done.
For this reason, the Court will very much likely Pierce the veil.
If you need any clarification do react or comment.
