<span>The US presidential election of 1800 is most remembered
because of the controversy it went through. This election was mostly based on
domestic affairs and foreign affairs played a negligible or no part at all. The
two presidential candidates, Jefferson and Aaron Burr were tied with 73 ballots
in their favour. John Adams the Federalist got 65 Electoral votes in his favor.
Later during the 36th ballot in the House of Representatives
Jefferson won and became president. Aaron was chosen the Vice President.</span>
So both the winner and loser were satisfied.
Answer:
A bank clerk
Explanation:
Just took it 2020 edgenuity
Feudalism in Europe and events during the Muromachi period
in Japan share some characteristics. During the Muromachi period in Japan,
there were powerful feudal lords called Daimyos who were only subordinate to
the Shogun (think of them as Commander-in-Chief) and the Japanese Emperor).
Daimyos were almost independent and ruled with almost absolute power on their
territories. Daimyos are the equivalent of Lords in Europe. Daimyos hired
Samurai, a noble class of warriors, and paid them with rice or land, just as lords
hire vassals and gave them land holdings (fiefs) in exchange for allegiance. In
this obligations, Lords/Daimyos gained solders and supplies, while Vassals/Samurai
gained land holdings and farms.
Answer:
William Shakespeare was an English playwright, poet, and actor, widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's greatest dramatist. He is often called England's national poet and the "Bard of Avon"
Explanation:
Answer:
The neutrality of the congress generated polarization in the country. This polarization caused states where slavery was prohibited to criticize and devalue states where slavery was allowed, which retaliated against devaluation with further devaluation.
Explanation:
When Congress decided to stay neutral in relation to slavery in the country, Congressmen believed that this would generate peace in the country, as each state would have autonomy to decide whether it wanted to use slaves or not.
However, the result could not have been more different. Neutrality generated polarization and many conflicts between countries that allowed slaves and prohibited slaves. Countries that did not allow slavery criticized, devalued and tried to interfere with the autonomy of the states that allowed slavery. The slaves who allowed slavery did not tolerate this interference and retaliated as best they could, in addition to promoting a strong devaluation in relation to free countries.