Answer:
Johnson & Johnson make $51,433.28 every 20 seconds
Explanation:
<u><em>The complete question is</em></u>
I'm playing a riddle game thing and one of the questions is
"How many dollars does Johnson & Johnson make every 20 seconds?"
I found that they make 81.1 billion dollars yearly, but I have no clue how to get it to 20 seconds.
Remember that
1 year=365 days
1 day=24 hours
1 hour=60 minutes
1 minute=60 seconds
so
Convert year to seconds
1 billion=1,000 millions
1 billion=1*10^9
81.1 billion dollars=81.1*10^9 dollars
we have
Convert to $/sec
Multiply by 20 sec
therefore
Johnson & Johnson make $51,433.28 every 20 seconds
Answer:
I used an excel spreadsheet to record this transactions on an accounting equation.
Practice Makes Perfect, Inc.
Income Statement
For the month ended July 31, 202x
Revenues $2,000
Expenses:
- Advertising expense $500
- Rent expense $1,000
- Wages expense $1,000
- Supplies expense $300
- Depreciation expense $750
- Interest expense $417 <u> ($3,967)</u>
Net income ($1,967)
Practice Makes Perfect, Inc.
Balance Sheet
For the month ended July 31, 202x
Assets:
- Cash $99,783
- Accounts receivables $1,800
- Supplies $1,700
- Pianos $47,250
Total assets $150,533
Liabilities:
- Accounts payable $2,500
- Notes payable $50,000
Total liabilities $52,500
Stockholders' equity
- Common stock $100,000
- Retained earnings ($1,967)
Total stockholders' equity $98,033
Total liabilities + equity $150,533
Answer:
B. 9.84%
Explanation:
Given that
D1 = 1.25
P0 = 27.50
g = 5%
F = 6%
Recall that
Cost of equity raised = (D1/P0 - [F × P0]) + g
Thus,
= 1.25/27.50 - [0.06 × 27.50] + 0.05
= 1.25/ 25.85 + 0.05
= 0.04835 + 0.05
= 0.09835
= 0.0984
=9.84%
The correct option is B
<u>Explanation:</u>
In an economy, planned investment spending is always equal to planned saving. If actual saving falls short of (exceeds) planned saving, then actual investment falls short of (exceeds) planned investment.
That is the other part of the saving paradox. If an economy produces too much, such that saving is greater than planned investment, inventory will build up, giving signal to producers to reduce output, to restore equilibrium. Such investment scheme is suitable only to communist countries. Keynes has another investment theory in his liquidity story. But investment theories are equally a posterior.
Therefore, Option B is correct
