The different elements of working capital are <u>current current asset and current liabilities</u>. The management of a business entity might take <u>ratio analysis</u> to reduce the cycle.
Working capital management assists in sustaining the smooth operation of the net operating cycle, otherwise called the cash conversion cycle.
<h3>What is working capital management?</h3>
Working capital management is a business strategy formulated to ensure that an organisation functions efficiently by overseeing and utilizing its current assets and liabilities to their most effective use.
Therefore, learn more about working capital management: brainly.com/question/28287025
#SPJ1
Answer:
11.68 years
Explanation:
For computing the number of years first we have to applied the NPER formula i.e to be shown in the attachment below:
Given that,
Present value = $11,000
Future value = $19,000
Rate of interest = 6.5%
PMT = $0
The formula is shown below:
= NPER(Rate;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after applying the above formula, the number of years is 8.68
Now after 3 years, it would be
= 8.68 + 3
= 11.68 years
Answer:
Heinz sells ketchup and other sauces and condiments. Their demand is relatively stable and doesn't change that much year after year. The demand for their products is not that seriously affected by economic recessions or expansions.
On the other hand, Sony is a consumer electronics company and the demand for their products can vary drastically from one year to another. It depends on trends and innovations, and their total sales are affected by disposable income (expansions increase disposable income while recessions decrease it).
FedEx is also affected severely by economic recessions or expansions. Since FedEx ships and transports goods, when the economy is booming, FedEx is doing excellent. But if the economy starts to cool down or enters a recession, the amount of goods transported falls.
Answer:
D. Corn is not used in the production of other goods.
Explanation:
D is the only option that can be an argument for the total value of the corn produced to be included as corn for the same year in the GDP.
This is due to the fact that only the final production is recorded in the GDP, this means that no goods are registered that are going to be part of other productive processes (generally raw materials) since double accounting would be incurred.
If for example, corn were part of another productive process and this productive process begins next year, that part of the corn used to produce that good would be included in the GDP of the year in which the product will be produced (the one that corn is used in the production).
This means that the lobbyist can only rely on option D (include all the value of corn for the year in which it was produced) if in this country the corn is not part of another productive process.
