Oh buddy this is d.........
Answer:
Mencius said, "There are five things which in common practice are considered unfilial. The first is .... The second is chess-playing and fondness for wine, without attending to the support and care of one's parents. This second thing supports Wang's view that between father and son reproof is the greatest offence against that tenderness which should subsist.
Explanation:
In the same connexion, Mencius says: "There
are five things which are commonly recognized to be unfilial. The first is laziness about employing legs and arms, resulting in failure to support parents. The second, gambling and chess-playing and fondness for wine, with the same result. The third, prizing goods and money and selfish devotion to wife and children, with the same result. The fourth, giving way to the temptations that assail one's eyes and ears, thus bringing his parents to shame. The fifth, reckless bravery, fighting and quarrelling, endangering thereby the happiness and the support of one's parents." (Bk. iv., pt. ii., c. xxx., v. 2.)
p. 163
Key words: sick, smothered(?), covered(?), nasty, green, detest
Author’s tone: negative
Answer:
The author uses symbolism to describe such a serious subject as the Holocaust because the book is aimed at children and young adults.
Explanation:
Eve Bunting´s story is a picture book for children. The title makes it clear that the main theme is the holocaust. However, the story itself is about the forest animals being subdued by "terrible things." They remain silent as their neighbors are taken away. There´s no direct reference to the Holocaust, but the story is a powerful reminder of such a dark historical event. Bunting is known for portraying serious topics in a way that is approachable to children and young adults.
Answer:
D. Negroes were not allowed to vote in the United States.
Explanation:
Looking at the other answer choices, this is the only one that actually makes sense.
It isn't important that people may or may not have felt hot on that day, and it definitely isn't a conclusion (almost like a main idea) of the excerpt.
Also, after reading Dr. King's speech, a conclusion/important fact wouldn't be when the speech was delivered either.
Lastly, Dr. King's whole speech is <u><em>against</em></u> the violence that is occurring to the Negroes in their community, meaning he didn't want violence.
