Answer:
The at-fault driver apologized profusely for causing the accident
Explanation:
The correct blank is at-fault
by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
Answer: Yes
Explanation:
There is no text or excerpt for reference however, based on the question we can assume that Zara is a creative person.
A creative person is one who comes up with a new way of doing things and as such can be described as a genius. The question gives praise to the ingenuity of Zara in coming up with a makeshift fishing net to catch fish.
Zara is therefore creative because Zara managed to come up with a way to fish that the crew had not had before which caught enough fish for the marooned crew to avoid starvation.
The answer is At the start of the hunt, Rainsford clearly was appalled by the idea that he would be the hunted. It was one thing to hunt animals, but the idea of hunting a human being was not something he had ever done
