1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergey [27]
3 years ago
7

Which of the following states attempted to put a half on operations at the bank of the United States

History
1 answer:
Talja [164]3 years ago
8 0
As a result, in 1819 a court case involving the existence of the national bank<span> made it all the way to the Supreme Court. </span>In the<span> case of Maryland vs. McCulloch, the </span>state<span> of Maryland </span>attempted to put a halt on operations at the Second Bank of the United States<span>. :)</span>
You might be interested in
Identify the court order that demands that an official bring an imprisoned person before the court so that the court can decide
makkiz [27]

Answer:

I believe it is a writ of habeas corpus

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
What are five majo or staff positions in a candidate’s campaign organization?
a_sh-v [17]

Answer:campaign manager, finance chair, pollster, media coordinator, scheduler

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
10
makkiz [27]
Chief Legislator: President shapes public policy. The President may suggest, request, and insist that Congress enact laws he believes are needed.
8 0
3 years ago
I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!<br><br> How was interstate commerce challenged?
podryga [215]

Answer:Hope This Helps

Explanation:

On February 4, 1887, both the Senate and House passed the Interstate Commerce Act, which applied the Constitution’s “Commerce Clause”—granting Congress the power “to Regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States”—to regulating railroad rates. Small businesses and farmers were protesting that the railroads charged them higher rates than larger corporations, and that the railroads were also setting higher rates for short hauls than for long-distance hauls. Although the railroads claimed economic justification for policies that favored big businesses, small shippers insisted that the railroads were gouging them.

It took years for Congress to respond to these protests, due to members’ reluctance to have the government interfere in any way with corporate policies. In 1874 legislation was introduced calling for a federal railroad commission. The bill passed the House, but not the Senate. When Congress failed to act, some states adopted their own railroad regulations. Those laws were struck down in 1886, when the Supreme Court ruled in  that the state of Illinois could not restrict the rates that the Wabash Railroad was charging because its freight traffic moved between the states, and only the federal government could regulate interstate commerce. Continued public anger over unfair railroad rates prompted Illinois senator Shelby M. Cullom to hold the hearings that led to the enactment of the Interstate Commerce Act.

That law limited railroads to rates that were “reasonable and just,” forbade rebates to high-volume users, and made it illegal to charge higher rates for shorter hauls. To hear evidence and render decisions on individual cases, the act created the Interstate Commerce Commission. This was the first federal independent regulatory commission, and it served as a model for others that would follow, from the Federal Trade Commission to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

Evolving technology eventually made the purpose of the ICC obsolete, and in 1995 Congress abolished the commission, transferring its remaining functions to the Surface Transportation Board. But while the ICC has come and gone, its creation marked a significant turning point in federal policy. Before 1887, Congress had applied the Commerce Clause only on a limited basis, usually to remove barriers that the states tried to impose on interstate trade. The Interstate Commerce Act showed that Congress could apply the Commerce Clause more expansively to national issues if they involved commerce across state lines. After 1887, the national economy grew much more integrated, making almost all commerce interstate and international. The nation rather than the Constitution had changed. That development turned the Commerce Clause into a powerful legislative tool for addressing national problems.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A restructuring of the Soviet economy that permitted more local decision making was known as perestroika.
never [62]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

hope this helps :)

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Farming was France's main purpose for settling in the New World
    12·2 answers
  • What does it mean to have the right to call the government to account???
    5·1 answer
  • The quote below comes from a book written by President John F. Kennedy:
    10·1 answer
  • How many of Alexander the greats generals divided up his empire after his death
    11·2 answers
  • Agricultural Revolution had what results?
    13·1 answer
  • Approval of a bill requires a _________________ of the total membership of that house—the equivalent of ninety-one "yes" votes i
    9·2 answers
  • Os registros históricos nos ajudam a entender melhor como o presente foi construído pela ação dos homens. Através das memórias d
    9·1 answer
  • Please Help will give brainliest and 20 points to whoever is correct
    9·1 answer
  • To what extent were the civil rights of African Americans in the South protected after the Civil War
    5·1 answer
  • What do the empires of Egypt, Mesopotamia, Ancient China, and Ancient India have in common?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!