Answer: There are multiple answers.
Explanation:
A Millet used real people for figures, but he painted the people with colors from his imagination
B Millet modeled the figures after his friends who posed for him in his studio
C He painted the figures as they appeared by using earthy like colors and solid shapes
D He took the figures from mythological sources, but he covered them with realistic and lifelike details.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the options for this open question. However, we can help to comment on the following.
The Column of Trajan combines the glory of battle with details of soldierly life to support the Roman sense of military and cultural superiority over its enemies.
Located in the Trajan's Forum in Rome Italy, this monument honors the victory of the Roman army of Emperor Trajan in the Dracian Wars. The column represents the many battles between Dacians and the Roman Empire.
This impressive monument also served as a propaganda tool in that it served the Roman Empire to show the power of the Roman army in different campaigns and its dominion over the Dacians.
I guess the answer is nature . I'm not sure .
Answer:
A strong relationship between the arts and politics, particularly between various kinds of art and power, occurs across historical epochs and cultures. As they respond to contemporaneous events and politics, the arts take on political as well as social dimensions, becoming themselves a focus of controversy and even a force of political as well as social change.
A widespread observation is that a great talent has a free spirit. For instance Pushkin, who some scholars regard as Russia's first great writer,[1] attracted the mad irritation of the Russian officialdom and particularly of the Tsar, since he "instead of being a good servant of the state in the rank and file of the administration and extolling conventional virtues in his vocational writings (if write he must), composed extremely arrogant and extremely independent and extremely wicked verse in which a dangerous freedom of thought was evident in the novelty of his versification, in the audacity of his sensual fancy, and in his propensity for making fun of major and minor tyrants.
Explanation:
