The poorest country in the world is Burundi, with a GDP per capita of $264
Nearly all of the world's poorest countries are in Africa, though Haiti, Tajikistan, Yemen, and Afghanistan are notable exceptions
Details: GDP per capita is measured in $USD, 2020.
Countries hit hardest by poverty are often countries that are also caught in political crises, including conflict, hunger, and climate change. These often become aggravating factors that keep communities trapped in cycles of poverty because their economic sources (Agriculture, Industry and Services) do not have sufficient infrastructures to sustain their productivity.
Despite the extremely low standard of living in these countries, it's still safe to say that there's economic potential for future growth as poverty does not ultimately define a person, a family, or a community. In addition, many experts have observed that Africa's infrastructure is currently improving at a rapid rate, opening the door to foreign direct investment and increased industrialization capacity. Much of this progress is due to the China Belt and Road Initiative and investment in several African countries.
Another proof of Africa's potential is the extremely large share of young people on the continent. This could translate into a sizeable future workforce, a growing internal market and potential for innovation and economic progress.
<em>-</em><em> </em><em>BRAINLIEST</em><em> answerer</em>
It increased the demand for coal and iron. we need the iron to build things and the coal to power things. Remember coal is what powered the steam engine.
The appropriate response is "The Preamble does not plot the forces of the Constitution." The Preamble serves exclusively as a presentation, and does not allocate forces to the national government, nor does it give particular constraints on government activity. Because of the Preamble's constrained nature, no court has ever utilized it as an unequivocal factor in the event of mediation, aside from as respects silly case.
Answer:
The 'mother country' to Brewster and Robinson was, of course, England and that was generally what was meant when the phrase came into use in the USA. They didn't coin the phrase themselves but probably read it in the works of a prominent Puritan of the day - Arthur Golding.
Explanation:
