An effective conclusion to an informational text should (5 points)

English

1 answer:

saveliy_v [14]3 years ago

3 0

It’s c because most of the time I would rephrase the conclusion

You might be interested in

How does Farquhar avoid dying at the bottom of the river?

True [87]

Answer: How does Farquhar avoid dying at the bottom of the river? He gets help from a juggler who was performing on the side of the river. He breaks free from his rope and makes it to the surface to get a breath of air. He kicks to the surface with his arms tied behind his back.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Determining a potential audience's characteristics will help you decide whether your audience for an argumentative essay will be

Vsevolod [243]

Determining a potential audience's characteristics will help you decide whether your audience for an argumentative essay will be interested, disinterested or oppose.

<h3>What is the audience's characteristics ?</h3>

The audience's characteristics can be described as the characteristics that those that are participating in an argumentative essay have, so as to be able to determine if they are in support or they were not in support of the argument.

It should be noted that in an argumentative essay the audience that is in the support of the motion is been as the one that have the same perceptive with the topic, while the one that oppose the topic can be seen as one that have perspective that is different from that of the topic.

In conclusion, to know about the audience that do not support or that support the motion can be known by their characteristics which will help to differentiate them.

Read more about audience at:

brainly.com/question/8170760

#SPJ1

3 0

1 year ago

[W]e can have no new deal until great groups of people, particularly the women, are willing to have a revolution in thought; are

GaryK [48]

Answer: Women need to give up things to have a revolution.

Explanation: I got it correct.

7 0

3 years ago

Where should the writer logically integrate this

muminat

Your question is incomplete, so I would have to give you a general overview to enable you get to the right answer.

The writer should logically integrate his research after making a claim

When a writer is trying to include a research into his essay, this is a supporting evidence that is used to validate a claim.

With this in mind, we should know that the author is trying to back up a claim he has already previously made.

For example, if an author is trying to make a point about dangers of bush burning, after he had made a claim that bush burning can worsen the ozone layer (for example), then he would bring evidence which shows how much the ozone layer has deteriorated after series of bush burning over the years

With this in mind, a writer would logically integrate his research after making a claim