Answer:
b
Explanation:
as feature story is something created by the mind of the narrator.
Answer:
It knowing the airmen's fears it enable us to identify on a basic or normal level.
With books that are good, the reader wants to recognize strongly with the characters.
Explanation:
With good books, the reader wants to strongly recognize with the characters, so good writers highlights certain traits they feel will resonate with others.
In Seabiscuit, Hillenbrand made characters strong around the horse who were examples of fears and universal hopes common to most of us.
In the crucible of war, actions are heightened by the see-sawing emotions brought on by death and life experiences.
By understanding the airmen’s fears in greater depth makes us to identify on a very basic level. The airmen are of each on dissimilar but universal in their fears of death and what it means to themselves, their families and comrades.
There are multiple ways of comparing and contrasting structures that each have different implications and dangers.
1. The back-and-forth method, in which every other sentence compares and contrasts. ie:
P1- theme
-p1 Book A is blah, whereas Book B is blah.
P2- theme
-p2 Book A is blah.... you get the point,
The danger of this method is sounding too redundant, although it does a good job of focusing on the themes.
2. The separate, mixed theme method, in which an entire paragraph is dedicated to each subject, but the themes are thus mixed up within those paragraphs. This method is less redundant but runs the risk of losing clarity of theme.
3. The compare vs. contrast method. This one is fairly straightforward: A paragraph comparing, a paragraph contrasting, and one of synthesis at the end. The pros: It's playing it safe, and it'll work. The cons: It's boring.
Combinations of these 3 methods work as well, it all depends on your personal writing style and the subjects you're comparing.
Good luck
Answer
try B. Introductory paragraph, sorry if im wrong!
Explanation:
