Answer:
It can be concluded that CFS has no effect on the light production of V.harveyi.
Explanation:
The both tube contain same cell concentration of V.harveyi.Now CFS is added from a light producing V.fischeri which ultimate result in the production of light by V.harveyi.
On the other hand V.harveyi cells present on another tube can itself produce light because according to the question fresh media is added in this tube inplace of CFS.
V.harveyi of both tubes produces same amount of light.From this point of view it can be stated that V.harveyi itself can generate light, it does not need addition of any CFS from outside.
This question illustrates DNA profiling within forensics. Here, a DNA<span> 'fingerprint' is obtained from a biological sample at a crime scene. This 'fingerprint' can be compared to profiles obtained from </span>DNA of individual suspects<span> or criminal DNA profiles stored on a database. In this case, </span><span>suspect iii is likely the perpetrator of the crime as his/her DNA profile matches that of the sample left at the crime scene. </span>
。☆✼★ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ☾
I'm not sure if there were supposed to be options or not.
However, I believe the answer would be evaporation.
Have A Nice Day ❤
Stay Brainly! ヅ
- Ally ✧
。☆✼★ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ☾