1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ser-zykov [4K]
3 years ago
9

What did Federalists and Anti-Federalists think of taxation? An answer for both.

History
2 answers:
Virty [35]3 years ago
7 0

911 what's your emergency um these people around here reporting me and not excusing me for taking points L m f a o please tell them to excuse me lol what's up

Hunter-Best [27]3 years ago
6 0

hi there again

your answer to this is

They believedthat the  power have  to tax was necessary to provide the national defense and to repay debts to other nations. Anti-Federalists opposed the power, but they fearing it could allow the central government to rule the people and the states by imposing unfair and repressive taxes,

i hope this helps u out

have a great after noon

FaithRawlins14

You might be interested in
In terms of jurisdiction, the Supreme Court has
enyata [817]
The supreme court has jurisdiction over all court cases that are brought up to them. So basically anything in the country that gets pleaded up that high<span />
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help will give brainliest
Vladimir79 [104]

the first written constitution in the American colonies

6 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast in the Mexican and the Brazilian revolution.​
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

All revolutions that exist or have taken place in this world are full of the revolution traits that were evidently pointedout throughout the book, Anatomy of Revolution written by Crane Brinton. One classification of the revolution that was mentioned in this piece of literature was, “A revolution is a drastic, sudden substitution of one group in charge of a territorial political entity by another group hitherto not running that government.” Some revolutions may approach this definition in a varied way. Many people think that revolutions only cause trouble and dismay. All the same, have you every considered of a peaceful revolution? Those two words “peaceful” and “revolution” may seem ironic together. Nevertheless, there is a severe illustration that had occurred in the past that proves the existence of this satirical phrase and the unique way of approaching a revolution: the Brazilian Revolution. In addition, I will be comparing the similarities that were showed among the Mexican Revolution and the Brazilian Revolution. Due to the reason of proving that the “peaceful revolution” is still considered an act of Enlightened citizens fighting for their rights. To start out, there are three major parts to the revolution, according to the reading that was in Anatomy of Revolution: cause, sequences, and the consequences. The cause of the revolution mostly states the basic ideas on whyand how the revolution sparked. In this case, Brazilian Revolution, the Portuguese all of a sudden appear out of the blue to the sacred land of Brazil. They were on their way from fleeing their country due to the attack of Napoleon. These unexpected people arrived at the land of Brazil and unbelievingly they start ruling over the natives. Of course the Brazilians were baffled by this action. The Portuguese start taking away the Brazilians’ privileges and rights. To illustrate, the Portuguese banned the Brazilians from trading with foreigners, growing crops or manufacturing goods that have the potential to compete with Spain. In yet another example, if we compare this event to the Mexican Revolution, even during the Mexican revolution, the Spaniards, who came to the land of Mexico

without warning started governing over the Mexicans. They used Mexicans as slaves and they received meager treatment and had to face the harsh reality. They gathered an unreliable amount of taxes from the natives, which, in the end,angered the lower statues and caused the revolt to take place. Even better, during the courses of the revolutions, both the Mexican and the Brazilian Revolutions created a contract of a constitution that had all the requirements of the radicals documented on it. At first, the rulers or the statue who was in absolute power, refused to sign or agree to the constitution. This lead to more riots and conflicts. Some revolutions, such as the Mexican revolution, created bloody wars and fights in order to gain the approval of their constitution. In other cases, such as the Brazilian Revolution, they cause no destruction on people’s lives and they did not carry out bloody wars-they decided to solve problems “peacefully.” After revolting a little more, the head ofthe conservatives decides to sign and be part of the contract, which leads towards the end of the revolution and this is the stage in which the radicals’ desires are fulfilled. In yet another example, the Mexican Revolution created the Inquala plan: whichcontained the three conditions: “One, Mexico would become an independent monarchy governed by transplanted king Ferdinand. Two, Creolles and Pennensulars would have equal human rights and civil liberties. Three, the Roman Catholic Churches could keep their privileges.” More precisely, the Brazilian Revolution created a petition that eight-thousand Brazilians signed, that asked King John to let his son, Dom Pedro, to rule this country. Eventually, Pedro gave the independence to the Brazilian, and he led theconstitutional monarchy in Brazil. Further more, in the end, or in the consequence, it seems that the rebels achieved what they were enthusiastic to posses. In much the same manner, both revolutions, the Mexican and the Brazilian Revolution, had a positive conclusion. Or in other words, they both gained freedom and independence, along with the equal rights and privileges they couldn’t enjoy and taste before. Taking these two revolutions as an example, you can realize that even a “peaceful revolution” canhave the same results as the violent revolution-the Mexican Revolution. Even though the two revolutions went through very similar, but very unique paths, their results were identical, which is all that matters in the end and the only thing that is taken credit

Explanation:

Hope this helped!

~Heaven~

6 0
2 years ago
GUYS PLS HELP!
Kay [80]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Scottish are from Scotland and think of themselves as better compared to the British. They also have half separated themselves from the British rule over them, ya.

3 0
3 years ago
11. Hypothesize why so many "immoral" priests and preachers were so successful in duping the
Vaselesa [24]
Many “immoral” priests and preachers may have been so successful in duping the populace is because they are people of high authority and power who people are drawn to trust.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The right of the National Government to defend itself from foreign and domestic enemies is which power type?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best describes the influence of the Magna Carta
    10·2 answers
  • Scarcity is an ongoing part of the human condition.
    15·2 answers
  • The area around the North Pole is called_____ region, while the area around the South Pole is called_____ region. Arctic
    9·2 answers
  • Women played a major role on the domestic front during ww2 by what?
    12·1 answer
  • What will be the simple interest earned by investing $1,500 for 5 years, at an interest rate of 10% annually?
    7·2 answers
  • Analyze the pictures and pick the correct answer from the Answer Key Column for each question. Then give evidence from within th
    5·1 answer
  • What can visual artifacts tell us about human history give 3 examples using full sentences
    11·1 answer
  • What was the challenges that women went through 1950s-1970s
    7·2 answers
  • Summarize Hollywood in the beginning
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!