Answer:
it's summer here is an easy search that explains it
Answer:
what is this a actual question or is this a response to something
Strict scrutiny, moderate scrutiny, and logical basis scrutiny are three tests.
To evaluate the legitimacy of differential treatment based on a suspicious classification, a Strict scrutiny test is applied (race, ethnic origin, religion).
In free exercise clause cases, the court previously applied strict scrutiny more frequently, as in Sherbert v. Verner (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), but the Employment Division v. Smith decision altered the approach (1990).
When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. The law must have been carefully crafted to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest" and have been passed by the legislature in order to pass rigorous scrutiny.
A law impacting a fundamental right must have a compelling state purpose in order to pass under the Strict Scrutiny criterion. In order to accomplish the goal or interest of the government, the law must also be carefully crafted.
To know more about Strict Scrutiny refer to: brainly.com/question/11550284
#SPJ1
Answer:
Sir Charles Wood
Explanation:
Sir Charles Wood was once and widely known as the President of the Board of Control when India was still under British rule. During this period, in 1854 Sir Charles Wood so many recommendations to the then Governor-General of India concerning education. These recommendations were later known as Wood's despatch among which is the recommendation for the establishment of Universities in India.
