The value of essentially contestable terms in nature is that they deliver value judgments. They also help to give nomenclature to problematic situations.
<h3>What are examples of terms that are essentially contestable?</h3>
Examples of essentially contestable terms are:
- Social Justice
- Gender-Based Violence
- Ethnic Discrimination etc.
Learn more about Essentially Contestable Terms at:
brainly.com/question/27100493
It depends what that ‘something’ is, if it’s really important then yes, point it out so you don’t forget it later. If it’s something small then there is little to no need to say it
D) Different states have different precedents regarding what defines a white person as opposed to a black person.
The excerpt specifically says that what defines a person as being black "is a difference of opinion in the different states." In NC "any visible admixture of black blood" defines a person as a black person. In OH, "it depends upon the preponderance of blood. In Michigan and Virginia, "white blood must only be in the proportion of three-fourths". This shows that there is not a best way to define race. Also, B is not correct because Michigan and Virginia use the same definition so they are in agreement at least. Option C is not correct because some states do not agree with this.
1. There’s a car crash
2. There are two men standing on the side of the road sad
3. There is a woman in the phone booth
4. There is a dog on the grass
5. The accident happened at a stop sign
The dog had most likely ran across the street and the vehicle on the right was most likely speeding, causing the man to swerve to not hit the dog but instead another vehicle and the woman is most likely call for help
