Answer and Explanation:
A. Given that Design 1A will cost $1.7 million to build and $175,000 per year to maintain
Given that Design 1B will cost $3.6 million to build and $40,000 per year to maintain
Both designs are assumed to be permanent
To find ROR using AW based rate of return equation, we find present value of each design and equate them:
Each design is permanent so
Present value of perpetuity:
Design 1A= 1700000+175000/r
Design 1B = 3600000+40000/r
=1700000+175000/r=3600000+40000/r
135000/r=1900000
Cross multiply
r=135000/1900000
r= 0.0710
r=7.10%
B Given that ROR=7.10% and MARR is 25%
MARR>ROR
Hence we reject both designs
If a certain household earns and spends $24,000 per year and, on average, holds a money balance of $6,000, then the velocity of money for this household is 4.
A household consists of one or more people who live in the same dwelling and share meals. It can also consist of a single-family or another group. Households are the basic unit of analysis in many social, microeconomic, and government models and are important to economics and inheritance.
The definition of household relates to family or social units living together, or household behavior. You and your family members who live with you are an example of your household. Budgets and checkbooks are examples of household budget tools.
Learn more about household here:brainly.com/question/9417571
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is (A)
Explanation:
Normally, goods which close substitutes tend to have more elastic demand as it is easier to switch from one brand to another because they are close substitutes. For example, if the price of Pepsi increases the consumers will easily shift towards Coca-Cola. So, close substitutes are price sensitive and they have high elastic demand compared to other goods.
Answer:
a motion for summary judgement.
Explanation:
According to my research on different legal proceedings , I can say that based on the information provided within the question this is a motion for summary judgement. This term refers to a request for the court to rule that the other party has no case, because there are no facts at issue. Which applies to this situation because Turista Airlines is not presenting any facts, yet they are arguing the case based on those non-existent facts.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The purchase and suppy of goods and services takes place in the product market.
