To improve a conclusion, a writer must bare in mind that it should not address a new topic, that is to say, it has to be a recompilation of the topics already mentioned and developed in the paragraphs, so it has to be a kind of "summary", an overall of the topics and ideas discussed. It should be concise and the reader needs to be know it is the conclusion and you are not going to keep on working on the ideas, so sometimes, it is necessary to include the words "to conclude"/ "to round up"/ "in conclusion" or something similar on order to let the reader know you are about to finish.
The interpretation that most accurately describes the portrayal of men in each passage is D) in both cases women are presented as a been who is made the serve and obey, following their role as housewife and mother.
The other options are not correct because they present in either passage 1 or 2 a man who sees women as equal which is not possible according to the ideology of the characters in these stories.
The answer would be B. It flows the nicest out of all 3 options and is written grammatically correct.
The dialogue should be presented as a conversation between two people, where there is an exchange of ideas and opinions between those involved.
<h3>How to write a dialog?</h3>
- Use two or more characters.
- Show how each character understands a specific subject.
- Have one character speak after the other has spoken.
- Keep the dialogue dynamic, where each character contributes to the evolution of the subject.
Carbon footprints refer to the amount of carbon dioxide that each person, machine, and the industry produces.
Based on this, you can create your dialogue by having one person defend the reduction of carbon footprints, in favor of preserving the environment, while the other person asks how this will be done without harming the economy and industrial production.
Learn more about dialogs:
brainly.com/question/11001554
#SPJ1
i want to say that the answer is c
