A sorites is an argument that strings together several arguments.
Answer: a research study published on a university’s website about how being in a zoo affects animals.
The most credible source would be the university research study. The site where people share stories is based on hearsay and anecdotal evidence, which is not credible enough. The advertisement does not include research. Moreover, its intention is that of selling something, and not that of informing. Finally, the blog is biased as the zoo owner is likely to have a particular position and advocate for that in his writing. The university research, however, is likely to contain original research and facts that have been proven right.
Answer:
"When medical providers are strong readers, they tend to see their patients as real people."
"When patients understand their goals, they are more willing to follow treatment steps."
"Doctors with strong writing skills are better at organizing information about those in their care."
"…writing also helps patients by allowing them to express their feelings. This can help reduce stress
Answer:
I'd say D
Explanation:
B is wrong (clearly), C is to... straight foward.... and A is a possibility but I believe its D.
