According to Haywood the voting behavior of people is based on sociological factors as well as the overlapping process.
<h3>What is voting behavior?</h3>
This refers to how the members of the electorates act during the polls in their country.
It refers to what informs the decisions that people make concerning the elections in the nation.
People vote based on party affiliations, relationship with candidate and the social rules of the locality.
Read more on voter behavior here: brainly.com/question/27597605?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ1
Answer:
<u>1) Why did the critics assign this derogatory term to Henri and his followers?</u>
Because the Ashcan School was creating an art form that portraits the day by day life of ordinary and humble people, and the detractors didn't believe that this was important. The term 'Ashcan' was often used, before the formation of this art movement, to describe art forms that were not understood or accepted by the audience. An ordinary art form.
<u>2) How was realism of this twentieth-century group different from realistic representation of the nineteenth-century?</u>
Because the members of the Ashcan School were focusing to portrait the urban life, while the 19th century realism wanted to do the opposite, choosing to paint the natural elements.
<u>3) Select a work of art by one of the followers of the Ashcan School and one of the nineteenth-century realistic paintings to illustrate your discussion.</u>
For this question, I think that the paintings you need to choose to ilustrate must contrast the ideas of these groups (Ashcan School and the traditional realism). Then, I believe that 'Hester Street' executed in 1905 by George Luks is a good choice, because it's portraits excacly what the Ashcan School wanted to do with art. On the other hand, 'The Cotton Pickers' (1876) or 'Long Branch, New Jersey' (1869), both executed by Winslow Homer, are a good counter argument.
Explanation:
Answer:
d. is the result of genetic drift
Explanation:
The Homo floresiensis is a small hominid species that lived on the island of Flores, Indonesia. It has been debated a lot about Homo floresiensis, is it Homo sapiens that shrunk in size because of the conditions, or is it a separate hominid species. The general consensus nowadays is that Homo floresiensis is a separate species of hominid, and this has been based on anatomical and genetic analyses. This species of hominid is very interesting as it only grew to a height of 1.1 meters, was sing tools, but it also lived for some time along side the Homo sapiens, meaning that our species had encountered these small hominids.
