Answer:
- The interactionist view.
Explanation:
Language development is demonstrated as the process that is associated with a child's learning of the ability to understand a particular language and communicate in it during the years of early childhood.
The interactionist view offered by Vygotsky of language development states that a child's acquisition of a language is highly determined by the social interactions of the child within the environment. Thus, this view asserts that both these interactions allow children to develop thinking as well as language.
In the given example, the 'use of combined gestures along with the verbal delivery of the speech' exemplify the 'social interaction' through which the children are able to develop cognition and ability to make meaning. Therefore, it follows Vygotsky's social-cultural <u>'interactionist view'</u> which states the <u>significant role of social interactions in the development of a language and thought in the child.</u>
We can actually deduce here that Amelia most likely applied the following technique to achieve this: E. She varied how fast or slow she talked.
<h3>What is public speaking?</h3>
Public speaking actually refers to the way of speaking to a large number of people in order to pass across knowledge or information to them.
The options that actually complete the question are:
A. She made big dramatic arm movements.
B. She used complex vocabulary.
C. She tried not to look directly at anyone.
D. She spoke the words quickly and loudly.
E. She varied how fast or slow she talked.
Thus, we see that Amelia grabbed the attention of the students because of the way she varied how fast or slow she talked.
Learn more about public speaking on brainly.com/question/13508843
#SPJ1
The author's strongest support for their statement is the reference to a major claim (Option B). In it, the author alludes to the strongest and clearest declaration that agrees with their statement by quoting the authors of Suburban Nation. This is not an allusion because of the direct nature of this reference (allusion = indirect reference). There is no repetition observed in this paragraph, and the author doesn't comment on what the opposing party believes. Therefore, by logic and by elimination, we can conclude that this is an example of a reference to a major claim.
It depends on what type of bullying it is and if your talking about a movie or a book...
