<u>A. According to the constant dividend growth model, the value of the firm depends on the current dividend level, divided by the equity cost of capital plus the grow rate.</u>
This is the false statement.
<u>Explanation</u>:
The fair value of stock can be calculated using the dividend growth model. While calculating the value of the stock, the growth of the dividends should be considered either in a stable rate or at a different rate during the period at hand.
The dividend growth model is also known as a <u>valuation model</u> as it is used to achieve the value of the stock.
Equity cost is the cost that the firm owes to the equity investors to compensate the risk of their investment.
Answer:
Make $200,000 in less than two month (Send me a message if interested)
If I told you that you could turn your spare time into a side-income online business, would you be interested?
I recently became introduced to two guys that were able to make $960,824.41 within 31 days. These guys are “anti-gurus”... they’re everyday guys. Their students have generated millions, too. And they also helped me to make over $200,000 in less than 2 months
I was able to convince them to show you how they did it on a free training event this week.
They’re sharing this for the first time and will show you how to turn your spare time into a $100,000.00 online side business.
The best part? You can do this with NO experience / technical skills.
Explanation:
Answer:
Risk-free rate decreases
Explanation:
The CAPM formula for calculating cost of equity requires one to know the value of 3 pieces of information only:
1. the market rate of return,
2. the beta value
3. the risk-free rate.
Ra = Rrf + [Ba∗(Rm−Rrf)]
where:
Ra=Cost of Equity
Rrf = Risk-Free Rate
Ba = Beta
Rm=Market Rate of Return
From the formula
Ra = Rrf + [1.2∗(Rm−Rrf)]
Ra = Rrf + 1.2Rm - 1.2Rrf
From Ra = 1.2Rm -0.2Rrf
From the expression above, it can be seen that the lower the value of Rrf (Risk-Free rate), the higher the value of Ra.
Answer:
$195,488.6
Explanation:
The computation of the amount at the end of the 22 years is shown below
The Amount at the end of 1st 11 years is
= Principal × (1 + interest rate)^number of years
= $19,750 × (1 + 0.09)^11
= $50,963.42
Now the amount at the end of the last 11 years is
= $50,963.42 × (1 + 0.13)^11
= $195,488.6
hence, the value at the end of the 22 years is $195,488.60
Answer:
It describes the problem of transaction costs and negotiation.
Explanation:
Externalities are situations that arise when the activities of an organization affects another for good or bad, but with the first organization that caused the change, receiving no benefits (if it was a positive change), or bearing no costs (if it as a negative change).
Ronald Coase proposed some theories about the possible solutions to externalities. One of them is negotiation between the two parties involved. The problem with this solution is the high costs of transaction that could be spent before an agreement is reached. The number of people involved in the negotiation could also be a problem.
