Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Beginning balance of Retained Earnings = $75,000
Net income = $26,000
Ending retained earnings = $91,000
Total Balance during the year:
= Beginning balance of Retained Earnings + Net income
= $75,000 + $26,000
= $101,000
Dividend declared:
= Total Balance during the year - Ending retained earnings
= $101,000 - $91,000
= $10,000
Therefore, the amount of dividend declared by the Superior during its recent year of operation is $10,000.
<span>Because the federal reserve would want to discourage quick investments or want people to save more money right now. Long term rates would go down because these are well thought out infrastructure projects that are good for the long run.</span>
Answer: The price elasticity of demand for good A is 0.67, and an increase in price will result in a increase in total revenue for good A
Explanation:
The following can be deduced form the question:
P1 = $50
P2 = $70
Q1 = 500 units
Q2 = 400 units
Percentage change in quantity = [Q2 - Q1 / (Q2 + Q1) ÷ 2 ] × 100
Percentage change in price = [P2 - P1 / (P2 + P1) ÷ 2 ] × 100
% change in quantity = (400 - 500)/(400 + 500)/2 × 100
= -100/450 × 100
= -22.22%
% change on price = (70 - 50)/(70 + 50)/2 × 100
= 20/60 × 100
= 33
Price elasticity of demand = % change in quantity / % change on price
= -22.22 / 33
= -0.67
This means that a 1% change in price will lead to a 0.67% change in quantity demanded. As there was a price change, there'll be a little change in quantity demanded because demand is inelastic. Thereby, he increase in price will lead to an increase in the total revenue.
Therefore, the price elasticity of demand for good A is 0.67, and an increase in price will result in an increase in total revenue for good A
Yes , Judy and Kristy have an enforceable binding contract
Explanation:
Kristy Johnston, Judy Olsen, and Joyce Johnston, their mother, owned real estate as common buyers. After Joyce died, she left Kristy her one-third share in the house. Kristy sent Judy a letter in 2009 promising Judy to purchase or sell Judy's share in the property.
Judy accepted the sale bid from Kristy. Kristy then tried to refuse Judy's approval and to cancel her bid for sale. Judy lodged a Kristy lawsuit.
The court granted the summary judgment to Judy finding that a contract had been drawn up between the letters exchanged between Judy and Kristy which satisfied the frauds ' status. The Supreme Court ruled that the district court decided out that an enforceable arrangement was established by exchanging letters from the parties.
