Answer:
c. Inductive and Strong
Step-by-step explanation:
In inductive reasoning, provided data is analyzed in order to reach a conclusion. In this case, the argument provides data regarding Jane and Nancy's awards and their love for mathematics and then draws a conclusion regarding Nancy's performance in a particular class, this is an example of inductive reasoning.
As for the strength of the argument, it is plausible to infer that Jane and Nancy have similar mathematics skills since they both love calculus and excel academically. Therefore, if Jane does well in the calculus class, it is a strong argument to say that Nancy does as well.
The answer is :
c. Inductive and Strong
Answer:
I agree with you,I also think its B
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The answer is below
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x represent the number of days that fluffy eats wet food in a week and y represents the number of days that fluffy eats dry food in a week.
Hence:
x + y = 7 (1)
Also, John wants to spend at most $9.00 on cat food each week. Hence:
1.5x + 0.75y ≤ 9 (2)
The list of possible points after solving graphically are:
(0,7), (6,0), (0,12) and (5, 2). If x,y > 0, then the point that satisfies the inequality is:
(5, 2) i.e. 5 wet food and 2 dry food
Answer:
other
Step-by-step explanation:
you should now this it's too esay in which standard are you. tell in comments
