It's not a denotation. If it were, the earth would be cinder long forgotten millions of years ago.
It really isn't to reveal the importance of watching the sky. The word burn is used poetically. If the poem wanted you to watch the skies, it would have said so either directly or indirectly using poetic language. Nowhere are you being asked to watch the skies.
There is nothing in theory about the burn and as a consequence there is nothing critical in the tone.
That only leaves A but it is not a very good answer.
A <<<< answer.
The contrast presented here is of the typical theme of Romantic literature, <u>the conflict and resolution between man and nature.</u>
Explanation:
The given lines are a Representative of a very Romantic concern, which is the <u>difference between things that seem important and things that are empirically important.</u>
What seems important is wealth which comes from man's artifice but if one understands nature's spontaneity, they will be able to find the purity of soul within them and only find in them to appreciate art.
<u>Art deriving from nature is also a parallel theme that runs her</u>e.
1. Volcanologists agree that eruptions still cannot be predicted with absolute certainty.
<span>(needs citation because who are you to know what most volcanologists agree on? Need to give a good citation for this "fact" which someone else may not agree) </span>
<span>2. If every home in America replaced one incandescent light bulb with an energy-efficient fluorescent light bulb, the energy savings would be enormous (Marcato, 78). </span>
<span>(Note, I put a comma after author Marcato, and you would have to title, IF you had two different sources by author Marcato) </span>
<span>3. Use the book's title instead of the author's name. </span>
<span>BTW, this is not a "history" question, but a research paper question, IMO. </span>
<span>Note, you must have a bibliography attached to paper when making citations, to give complete data in regards to where you found your sources cited.</span>
Answer:
A- Robert <u>polished</u> his saddle.
Explanation:
If you take out "his saddle", the sentence does not make sense. Taking out "for the wagon", the sentence will still make sense. If you can take out the word(s) that the verb is applying to (what is Robert doing, he's polishing his saddle), and if the sentence does not make sense, then it is a transitive verb.
Answer:
The answer to ur question IS WELL I ACTUALLY DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU NEED HELP WITH THAT LOOKS EASY FOR UR GRADE.
Explanation:
So before u ask again try doing it before u ask for help.
