Answer:
It is an attempt to influence society to accept a dissenting point of view. Although it usually uses tactics of nonviolence, it is more than mere passive resistance since it often takes active forms such as illegal street demonstrations or peaceful occupations of premises. The classic treatise on this topic is Henry David Thoreau's "On the Duty of Civil Disobedience," which states that when a person's conscience and the laws clash, that person must follow his or her conscience. The stress on personal conscience and on the need to act now rather than to wait for legal change are recurring elements in civil disobedience movements. The U.S. Bill of Rights asserts that the authority of a government is derived from the consent of the governed, and whenever any form of government becomes destructive, it is the right and duty of the people to alter or abolish it.
Explanation:
Answer:
the Ottomans were not tolerant towards other religions but the Mughals were accepting. ... 1) Were tolerant towards other religions in their empire. 2) Mainly run by Muslims but allowed Hindus to have government and military positions.
This is a tricky question, because none of these answers are completely true, but the best option if you have to choose one would be "President Lincoln suspended habeas corpus to keep Maryland <span>in the union."</span>