Mongol rule had the great consequence of separating Russia from Western Europe. Then, it contributed significantly to the cruelty and harshness of folk customs and administrative practices. Much Orientalism entered the Russian life through the Moscow. Moscow has lent, perhaps, some useful lines in the organization of government, finances, statistics, but this positive profit is quite lost when compared to the enormous evil that undoubtedly brought evil times.
Explanation:
- Mongol rule undoubtedly completely torn the state and national unity of the Russians, insofar as it was, although it did not completely suppress the national consciousness.
- The western and southwestern Russian provinces were not long under the influence of the Tatars, but came under the influence and power of Poland, Lithuania and some Germans.
- Northwest Russia, like northern Russia, was more nominally under Tatar rule, while the middle of the country remained under the yoke for the longest and longest.
Learn more on Mongols on
brainly.com/question/1600671
brainly.com/question/1560379
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
They didn't like it
Explanation:
The British believed that the colonies were just their little subsidiaries or sidekicks almost. The British needed money because of their war with France, they didn't want to tax their people in the mainland excessively so they taxed the colonies.
City-states in ancient Greece
They were called "Polis", every Polis produced enough to feed their population. They had their own institutions, laws, currency and army. The belief was that each Polis was protected by their own God, who should they owe respect and sacrifice.
They were ruled by an elite group whose authority was indisputable.
Examples of the two most important city-states that practiced oligarchy in ancient Greece
- Athenas: the government was form by the wealthiest. They were the owners of the land and they had the means to buy weapons to defend the Polis. They formed children in a fisical and intelectual ways. The society in Athena was divided into the
- citizens: divided between the rich and the poor
- metecos: foreing people who where not consider citizens, but they could pay taxes and be part of the army.
- slaves: men and women submitted to a master.
Athenian politics evolved to democracy
- Sparta: it was the rival city of Athenas. It was always ready to go to war. The military education started since childhood. They were forced to take a military politic in the face of constant need to dominate peoples submitted as a result of its territorial expansion.
The obsession with militarization was such, that newborn babies were checked to fulfill with physical patterns of a warrior, if they were not, they were slaughtered.
It was a government by the nobles.
Spartan society was divided into
- Ilotas: slaves without political rights, workers of the land
- Periecos: free farmers, but they must be part of the army if they are needed.
- Espartiatas: nobles, those who took part in politics
Answer:
Social classes included leaders, merchants, religious leaders, labourers, free citizens and the slaves. The leaders were people who founded a community or settlement, their lineage naturally became the new leaders of the communities as the years went by.
Explanation:
Social classes included leaders, merchants, religious leaders, labourers, free citizens and the slaves.