All categories

3 years ago

Describe communism and how it differs from the United States system of capitalism?

Law

2 answers:

masya89 [10]3 years ago

5 0

Explanation:

Differences between Capitalism and Communism

Capitalism

System of government is democratic

Property is privately owned

Driven by free enterprise

Wealth distributed unevenly

Education and health care provided by private entities

Freedom of the press Class distinctions: upper class, middle class and working class

Focus is on the individual and his/her own progress in life

Communism

System of government is totalitarian

Property is owned by the state

No free enterprise is allowed

Wealth distributed equally

Education and health care provided by the state

Press controlled and owned by the state

Classless society: all members of society are considered to be equal

Focus is on the progress of the community as a whole

fenix001 [56]3 years ago

5 0

Communism Is totalitarian while capitalism is democratic

You might be interested in

HELPPPPPPPPPPP PLZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!!!!!!! WILL MARK BRAINLIST TO WHOEVER ANSWERS FIRST!!!!!!!!!!

xenn [34]

Answer:

A. Liuidated damages ejdjfjxnfndj

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Selling to highest bidder

maxonik [38]

Answer:

99999999999999999999999999

6 0

3 years ago

When courts exercise the power to stop actions of government until the relevant government policies and activities can be examin

avanturin [10]

Answer:

When courts exercise the power to stop actions of government until the relevant government policies and activities can be examined at trial, this is known as injunctive power.

Explanation:

An injunction is a decision of a court or authority that often means that the person to whom the decision applies must do something. The injunction may also mean that the person to whom the decision applies must refrain from doing anything. An injunction can be combined with a fine, which means that anyone who does not follow the injunction can be forced to pay a sum of money.

With respect to the acts of the government, injunction measures taken by the courts represent a stop on administrative activity in order to control the legality and origin of the actions that are being carried out.

7 0

4 years ago

pol 470 Justiciability is an appropriate or suitable reason for a federal tribunal to hear or to solve a conflict. Question 7 op

Sophie [7]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

It is true that a federal tribunal can hear or solve a particular conflict by referring to the concept of justiciability. Justiciability is a term in law that refers to the limits upon legal issues over which a court can exercise its judicial authority. In other words, justiciability establishes the situations when a particular court can exercise its duties. When a court cannot provide an adequate solution to a dispute, the matter is considered not justiciable.

7 0

3 years ago

What if a Court had stuck to its precedent?

Debora [2.8K]

Answer:

Supreme Court justices need a healthy respect for past precedents. But sometimes, precedent is so bad it simply has to be overturned.

The court did just that last month in the case of Knick v. Township of Scott. The court delivered a victory for champions of property rights by overturning a 1985 precedent that had blocked property rights cases from federal courts.

This overturning of an older decision sparked a vigorous public debate. Two Supreme Court justices staked out opposing positions: Elena Kagan warned against a rush to overturn precedents, while Clarence Thomas suggested older decisions that are in fact wrong should be changed.

We should welcome this debate because it highlights the judiciary’s duty to correct its own mistakes and to ensure that our constitutional rights are properly and fully protected.

4 0

3 years ago