Answer:decade that brought the end of the Cold War and most other wars, the spread of democracy practically everywhere and the rise of environmental consciousness cannot be all bad. (Alternative intro: A decade that saw the rise of AIDS and the drug wars, the crushing of the democratic aspirations of one-fifth of mankind and the advent of the ozone hole and the greenhouse effect is a decade that leaves a lot to be desired.)
Well, of course. History is like the curate`s egg: good in parts. But I have been a professional gloom-monger for a long time now (no news is good news, but usually, for journalists, good news is no news), and I cannot remember a time when I felt so optimistic about the state of the world.
Conditionally optimistic, certainly. All the good news and hopeful prospects could go down the tubes without so much as a gurgle if there is a successful counter-revolution in the Soviet Union-which is a possibility, though one that diminishes slightly with each month. A reactionary regime in Moscow would not just be bad news for Soviet citizens; it would blight all our lives.
To maintain itself in power and justify severe domestic repression, a reactionary, neo-Bolshevik regime in Moscow would need foreign enemies. That would mean a return to the Cold War and an acute crisis in Central and Eastern Europe.
Worse, the international system, which is just starting to show signs of functioning in accord with rational and human values, would collapse into deadlock again. This would thwart all attempts to coordinate action on the really important long-term issues that affect all mankind: the environment, and the gulf between North and South.
But assuming (with fingers crossed) that the Soviets can keep their manifold problems under control and stagger onward toward their constantly receding future of democracy and prosperity, then the sea change in the international environment is real. The world may still be overwhelmed by its long-term problems in two or three more decades, but at least this change creates the possibility that that time will be used to try to solve the problems.
Explanation:
Answer:
the news letter was the first irish newspaper
<h2>The 26th Amendment lowered the voting age from 21 to 18.</h2>
Context/details:
Faster means of communication pushed the progress of the 26th Amendment. This was seen in the protest movements going on during the 1960s, leading up to 1971 when the 26th Amendment was passed by Congress and ratified by the states. Protests against the Vietnam War were active on college campuses across the country, with communication between students and media reports being a big part of the story. Part of those protests were the demands of young people chanting, "Old enough to fight, old enough to vote." Since 18 was old enough to be drafted to fight in the war, young people argued for their right to vote as full citizens.
The 26th Amendment was passed by Congress on March 23, 1971. It was ratified by the states faster than any other amendment, achieving ratification by July 1, 1971.
The 26th Amendment is worded as follows:
- <em>Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.</em>
- <em>Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.</em>
Answer:
The Cuban missile crisis
Explanation:
The Cuban Missile Crisis was a time of heightened confrontation between the Soviet Union, the United States, and Cuba during the Cold War.
It may have been the moment when the Cold War came closest to a nuclear war. There was a coup in Cuba in 1959. A small group led by Fidel Castro took power in this Cuban Revolution.
The Cuban Missile Crisis comes to an end. The Cuban Missile crisis comes to a close as Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev agrees to remove Russian missiles from Cuba in exchange for a promise from the United States to respect Cuba's territorial sovereignty.