In “The Break,” How does Faizula’s culture influence the story?

1 answer:

4 0

The passage had points wherein his culture was influential in the story in a more religious moral. This is mostly about selflessness that can come with rewards that are even better. It is highlighted that Faizula has been more serious about his religion because of his mother and the fact that he is a naturally kind man with principles that he follows. When he was at the point of breaking down and losing his composure because of the monitor breaking down and several challenges in his way, a strange man had an impact of when he asked if he could have a rose, had a significance in the lesson that he was learning.

You might be interested in

Which of the following details does Tan provide to develop this central idea? Check all of the answers that are correct.

anygoal [31]

Answer:

B,D

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

NEED HELP ASAP

blagie [28]

Answer:

The best party

Explanation:

best, and party are both verbs.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

This is a long, uninterrupted speech by a character in a play, story, or poem.

Alex787 [66]

So we have a monologue and a soliloquy.

Monologue - Long speech by a single character revealing private thoughts and feelings

Soliloquy - a character relates thoughts / feelings to him/herself and the audience often when alone.

The difference between the two is that a soliloquy is personal, the other characters cannot hear it.

I want to say that a long, uninterrupted speech by a character in a play, story, or poem or a monologue.

7 0

3 years ago

Who are the main characters of "No more dead dogs?"

scZoUnD [109]

Mr fogelman
trudi
wallace wallace
rachel turner
dylan
steve cavanaugh
i think

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In 300 words or less, explore how the external events of the plot affect an internal change within Sanger Rainsford.General Zaro

Ket [755]

I see you have already provided an answer. I will, however, develop it further.

Answer and Explanation:

The external events in "The Most Dangerous Game", a short story by Richard Connell, affect an internal change within the main character, Sanger Rainsford. Rainsford is a famous hunter, who also happens to be quite arrogant about his luck and position in life. He does not care about what the animals he hunts feel. Rainsford is unable to empathize with their fear. According to him, the world is divided into hunters and huntees, and he is lucky to belong to the former instead of the latter.

However, Rainsford's luck changes drastically once he accidentally lands on General Zaroff's island. Zaroff, like Rainsford, is a hunter incapable of empathy for his prey. The difference lies in the fact that the general has grown tired of hunting irrational beasts. He now hunts man. And since Rainsford sees this as murder and refuses to hunt alongside him, Zaroff decides to make Rainsford his new prey.

Of course this conflict is bound to cause Rainsford to change internally. Just like an animal, Rainsford is at a disadvantage. He does not possess a gun, while Zaroff carries one and uses hound dogs to help him in his hunt. Rainsford is now no different than one of the beasts he used to hunt. Fear of death is what drives him - the basic instinct to survive that every single animal in the world has.

Of course, Rainsford is a human being. He is rational and intelligent enough to find a way to beat Zaroff. Still, until that happens, he suffers the agony of having to run for his life, to hide in fear. The external event of becoming a prey certainly changes Rainsford into a man capable of empathizing.

7 0

4 years ago