Answer:
1. Some event in the past may lack sources that tell what really happened without contradicting it.
2. There is total truth about most events that have happened in the past.
3. An interpretation based on facts and evidence becomes more credible than another.
Explanation:
It is important that we know what happened in the past to encourage behaviors that worked and not repeat the same mistakes that citizens have made in the past. In short, the success of the future depends on a full understanding of events that occurred in the past and were able to influence how we live today.
For this reason, it is important that major events are fully and fully documented. These documents will serve to show the citizens of the future what happened and what were its consequences, without addressing contradictions, but addressing facts and evidence. Without these documents, the study of the past becomes very difficult.
It is important to remember that these documents show facts that show the history as it was, as an absolute truth, leaving no scope for incorrect interpretations. An example of this can be seen today in Brazil. Brazil underwent a strong military dictatorship in its past and although there are many documents that prove all the violence and absurdities of that time, many people say that this moment may have been positive, depending on the way that each interprets it.
The author shows a how a protective tariff will benefit people in his town by describing the various ways in which the protective tariff could help benefit people, making examples about how different people in town would have some benefits, like the mercantile and its commercial pursuit, or the parents and their earnings that went to the comforts of their aged parents.
<span>---
</span>The author illustrates how the town would be negatively affected if the factory was to close by portraying an imaginary future image where the factory is closed and everyone mentioned before joining in conversations, comparing the past to the present.
<span>---
The proper method for setting questions of economic and national policy is to see for themselves,</span> imagining to themselves the difference between a factory at work and a factory burnt, because when people can see the practical difference between a factory stopped and a factory active, the issue will be easily resolved.<span>
---
</span>A modern autoworker employed by an American manufacturer might favor a protective tariff today because of the aggressive competition from other brands that make life difficult for the American manufacturer, and so the hope is that a protective tariff will help them avoid such impasse.
<span>---
American consumers might oppose a such tariff because of its price, as the price for imported goods will grow, and also because the sociocultural context is different, and globalization should have come to an end to protective tariff mechanism since the manufacturer that works only with American people only on the U.S. soil are very limited.</span>
I don't know all of them but the battle of Lepanto took place in 1571.
