Answer:
The burden of proof is the obligation to present evidence on the subject of the lawsuit or the criminal charge
Explanation:
When an individual files a civil lawsuit against another individual, the burden of proof would rest on his or her shoulder. When the case gets official response and the trail process begins, each of the two parties involved would be asked to narrate their own side of the story. However, the party who brought the case to the court, known as the plaintiff, would be the one to prove that the things alleged in the lawsuits are only but true and that the other defendant caused the said harm or damages being talked about.
The foreign policy would have a strong nationalistic component, and alliances and treaties would only be formed when they were advantageous to American Indian policy.
<h3>What did alliances in World War 1 mean?</h3>
A WW1 alliance system. As previously established, the definition of alliances WW1 is a pact between a group of nations to aid one another in times of conflict. Before the conflict started, the alliance structure for WW1 was established. Some alliance systems go all the way back to the nineteenth century.
<h3>What kind of alliances are examples of?</h3>
One of the best examples of a strategic partnership is the agreement between Starbucks with Barnes & Noble. Coffee is brewed by Starbucks. Books can be found at Barnes & Noble. To a benefit of the both businesses, each one does what it does best while splitting the costs of the facility.
To know more about alliances visit:
brainly.com/question/28195787
#SPJ4
I really need help are you good at law
Based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
This is because, before the agreed date of 20th August, X withdrew her acceptance and sent it by post and also made a call to Y which informed him of her current stance.
<h3>What is a Contract?</h3>
This refers to the legally binding agreement that exists between two or more people about the terms of something.
Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
Notwithstanding the arrival of the postal letter of acceptance, this is considered void as there has been a change of terms that have been clearly communicated to the other party.
Read more about contract here:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Answer:
what is the question
please mark me as brainlist
thanks
