Hello there!
The Republican Cursus Honorum was the order of magistracies that were to be climbed step by step in Republican Rome to reach the highest possible rank.
The order was the following:
1) Quaestores: Were in charge of overseeing public funds.
2) Aediles: Were the "Mayors" of Rome, in charge of urban planning, festivities, wheat distribution...
3) Praetores: Were in charge of presiding over the Courts of Rome.
4) Consuls: Were the highest magistrates in Rome. Two consuls were elected each year, and they were the Roman "Chiefs of State".
The Louisiana Purchase and the Lewis & Clark Expedition and its “Sea-coasts, or Inland Countries; Course and Junctions of Rivers and First, Jefferson was eager to push western exploration and American claims It is also questionable how firmly the expedition reinforced the nation's claim to the Oregon territory.
THE answer is C.
<span>Charles Dickens began as a law clerk in 1827 to provide for his family. He also spent a great deal of time in the theater district. By the age of 20, he was a reporter for The Mirror of Parliament during the age of Queen Victoria. The rise to writer status was a vast difference to the job he had at age 12 as a factory worker.</span>
Marti's goal for a free Cuba reveal about his thinking is that Jose Marti's endurance to the justification of Cuban freedom and his passionate theory in democracy and justice has made him a warrior for all Cubans and a symbol of unity.
Explanation:
Law does not function in vacuum. Law operates for and in the society; and it is influenced by the mores and attitudes of the society. Correspondingly, law is an instrument of social change. The law thus never can be static; it has to change constantly with the changes in the society. Judiciary plays a major role for this change since judges interpret and redefine the laws through their judicial decisions. The demands of the time and society become prominent factors for judge in the law interpretation process. Their judicial opinions consequently become precedents - 'settled' or 'established' law that can provide legal foundation for settling subsequent cases. Hence, those who are associated in the field of law have to read case judgments for their research or academic purposes.
Mere knowledge of legal rules is not enough to do research in law. It also needs the analytical skills to extract ratio, observation and to apply these principles in different factual situations. This paper endeavors to identify certain parameters, which by no means are exhaustive but are only enabling points which could help a researcher to read and understand the judicial opinion. To achieve the very purposes of reading, the yardstick is not mere the ability to read, but to comprehend very essence of what is written.
The author believes that when a judgment is written well with clarity and consistency, even a common man would be able to figure out the contours of law. Since the objective of any judgment or judicial opinion is justice, the judge's conveying skill and the reader's skill ought to converge upon a common end.
