1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
inessss [21]
3 years ago
15

Which of the following is not a reason why American expansionists were interested in acquiring Hawaii in the late 1800s?

History
2 answers:
Alexus [3.1K]3 years ago
8 0

The American expansionists were not interested in the Islands of Hawaii for the purpose to gain control of the profitable sugar industry.

<u>Explanation:</u>

The Islands of Hawaii was never seen as the place for the production of sugar cane due to the isolation of the islands from the rest, so any trade that was going to take place was not going to bring in a solid amount of profit.

Instead, Hawaii was considered as a place of great strategic importance for the future, so that was the biggest reason why there was an interest of gaining control over it for a naval base and coaling stations for ships.

Greeley [361]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is - B. To gain control of the profitable sugar industry.

The Hawaiian islands were never seen as a place that is going to be used for production of sugar cane, and this is was mainly because of the isolation of the islands from the rest of the world, so any trade that was going to take place was not going to bring in solid amount of profit. Instead, Hawaii was considered as a place of great strategic importance for the future, so that was the biggest reason why there was a big interest of gaining control over it.

You might be interested in
What are reasons for challenging slavery
aleksandrvk [35]

Answer:

The entail for negotiating for freedom and manumission.

7 0
3 years ago
The caste system of india is an example of
RSB [31]
An ancient religion because there is a religion that uses the caste system
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What connection does that Bible story and Dylan's song have with ethics and the so-called "Divine Command Theory" as espoused by
Darina [25.2K]

The connection is that Dylan's song ("Highway 61 Revisited") and "that Bible story" (Abraham sacrificing Isaac) both point to the ethical idea that doing the right thing means doing whatever it is that is divinely commanded.  

Explanation/context:

The origins of "Divine Command Theory" stem back to a dialogue written by Plato, which has the philosopher Socrates engaged in discussion with Euthyphro about the meaning of piety or goodness.  Socrates was being accused of impiety in Athenian court.  Impiety to the Athenians meant conduct that was displeasing to the gods.  At that same time, Euthyphro was at court in Athens to prosecute his own father for having killed a servant.  Socrates asked the kinds of questions he normally did, pressing Euthyphro how he knew that prosecuting his own father was a good thing.  Euthyphro said punishing wrongdoers for wrongdoing was the pious thing to do, no matter who the wrongdoers are.  Socrates then asked Euthyphro to how we know what "piety" is -- and Euthyphro said it was doing that which is dear to the gods.  That's the "divine command" theory in a nutshell.  Bear in mind, as the dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro continued, there was much more nuanced thought about how well that definition works.  Socrates asked, for instance, "whether the pious or holy is beloved by the gods because it is holy, or holy because it is beloved of the gods."  That became a difficult conundrum for their consideration in the dialogue.

The Abraham story in the Bible follows the "divine command theory" idea. When God commanded Abraham to sacrifice his only son Isaac, the fact that God commanded it would make it right, according to divine command theory -- even though the act itself seemed horribly wrong.

Bob Dylan played with that idea in the lyrics to his song, "Highway 61 Revisited," from the album <em>Highway 61 Revisited </em>(1965) ...

<em>Oh, God said to Abraham, "Kill me a son"</em>

<em>Abe said, "Man, you must be puttin' me on"</em>

God said, "No" Abe say, "What?"

God say, "You can do what you want, Abe, but

The next time you see me comin', you better run"

Well, Abe said, "Where d'you want this killin' done?"

God said, "Out on Highway 61"

5 0
3 years ago
FASSSSSSSTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
OLEGan [10]
80+80+80=240
Hope u get it right ‍♀️
8 0
3 years ago
The Korean war was an effort by the United States to
I am Lyosha [343]
Contain the spread of communism
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Politics are best defined as
    15·2 answers
  • Why did Benjamin Franklin have someone else read his speech on the final day of the Constitutional Convention?
    6·1 answer
  • What were the name of contracts the governments on during World War II with industry
    5·1 answer
  • How might Islamic scholars have used Galen’s treatise to further innovations in medicine?
    14·1 answer
  • True or False: During the English Civil War that began in 1642, Charles I led the Parliament to victory, establishing the Common
    15·2 answers
  • What situation would be considered an example of freedom of association?
    9·2 answers
  • The first battle of the civil war was located at
    6·2 answers
  • Hitler's "Final Solution to the Jewish question" can be described by which
    11·2 answers
  • Who was the first president to recognize hanukkah in the white house?
    13·1 answer
  • How did Indians gain power in some areas after European colonization began?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!