Answer:
D. The right to a lawyer; it allows a defendant to always be able to defend themselves in a criminal case.
Explanation:
The famous Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainright in 1963 was a case regarding a convict Clarence Earl Gideon, who had no legal representation and his pleas to be given a lawyer by the government. The ruling was in favor of Gideon and asked the state to provide a lawyer for the defendant.
According to the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution, every citizen has the right to equal protection under the law. And the 6th Amendment also states that criminal defendants have the right to get representation even if they cannot afford one. So, in respect to these two amendments, the<u> Gideon v. Wainright case touched both issues and thus, gave the defendant the right to be represented by a lawyer and also be given the chance to defend himself in any criminal case.</u>
Thus, the correct answer is option D.
I would suggest posting this again if not already done
Answer:
Thomas Malthus was an English economist and demographer best known for his theory that population growth will always tend to outrun the food supply and that betterment of humankind is impossible without strict limits on reproduction.
The main way in which the English Bill of Rights influenced the Declaration of Independence is that it explicitly laid out certain liberties of the English people that the King was not allowed to infringe upon. This influenced the Founding Fathers since they felt that the king had infringed upon their natural rights.
Answer:
Some Americans felt that the Articles of Confederation was not sufficient for the new nation because Congress had little power. Other than the few things they were able to do, the rest of the power belonged to the states. I think it was most important to correct that Congress wasn't able to enforce any of its powers, and also unable to collect state debts. If Congress couldn't enforce any of its powers, it couldn't really control anything. If they were also unable to collect state debts, then they wouldn't have enough money either. Money was essential, since if Congress didn't have money or enough power, they were pretty much almost pointless.
Hope this helped!
